2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New insights into the fouling mechanism of dissolved organic matter applying nanofiltration membranes with a variety of surface chemistries

Abstract: Nanofiltration (NF) membrane fouling by DOM remains a major and poorly understood issue. To acquire a better insight we studied the fouling of the DOM fractions humic acids (HAs) and fulvic acids (FAs), with and without Ca(2+), on native and grafted ceramic NF membranes. Grafting with two methods and three different grafting groups allowed to create a range of membranes with a variety of surface chemistries, and a wide range of surface polarity, much broader than ever used in previous studies. A typical polyme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dominant organic matter removal mechanism was found to be increased by the electrostatic interaction between charged model compound and positively charged membrane surface [32]. Current research also reports that membrane fouling can be determined by the surface chemistry such as foulant-membrane interactions [38]. Thus, protein fouling can be explained by the pH and ionic strength influence on the electrostatic interaction between positively charged MWCNT membrane and both charged proteins (BSA and Lys).…”
Section: Fouling Mechanisms Under Solution Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The dominant organic matter removal mechanism was found to be increased by the electrostatic interaction between charged model compound and positively charged membrane surface [32]. Current research also reports that membrane fouling can be determined by the surface chemistry such as foulant-membrane interactions [38]. Thus, protein fouling can be explained by the pH and ionic strength influence on the electrostatic interaction between positively charged MWCNT membrane and both charged proteins (BSA and Lys).…”
Section: Fouling Mechanisms Under Solution Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A recent study has shown that the extent of flux decline in combined fouling is governed by: (a) the type of organic and colloidal foulants present in the feed solution; (b) the concentration of organic and colloid foulants; and (c) the ionic strength and/or concentration of cations 14 . Flux decline in combined fouling has been ascribed to a combination of increased hydraulic resistance to water flow imparted by the combined effects of the cake layer resistance, CECP effects, and organic‐calcium complexation 14,15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in fouling propensity between membranes arise from differences in their physicochemical properties. Research has shown that surface roughness promotes membrane fouling [11,12,42,60]. Herein, SEM was used to compare the surface morphology of the NF90 membrane to that of the TFC QI membrane (Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussion Of Fouling Propensitymentioning
confidence: 99%