2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2016.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein fouling in carbon nanotubes enhanced ultrafiltration membrane: Fouling mechanism as a function of pH and ionic strength

Abstract: CitationLee J, Jeong S, Ye Y, Chen V, Vigneswaran S, et al. (2016) Protein fouling in carbon nanotubes enhanced ultrafiltration membrane: Fouling mechanism as a function of pH and ionic strength. Separation and Purification Technology. Available: http:// dx.Please cite this article as: J. Lee, S. Jeong, Y. Ye, V. Chen, S. Vigneswaran, T. Leiknes, Z. Liu, Protein fouling in carbon nanotubes enhanced ultrafiltration membrane: Fouling mechanism as a function of pH and ionic strength, Separation and Purification … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(45 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering UF of quasi‐pure coconut protein, which the interaction of the functional group other than amine was neglected, it was obvious that the J * was highest at pH 9.0 due to the strong electrical repulsive interaction between both protein–protein and protein–membrane (ζ‐potential of −36.47 mV for protein, and −66.20 mV for membrane). These interactions hindered the agglomeration, enhanced the solubility, and reduced the particle size of the protein molecules (Figure 7d), thus the deposition of the proteins on the membrane surface was substantially decreased (Lee et al, ). However, the small particles were easier to be clogged in the membrane pore since the R p obtained at pH 9.0 was highest (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering UF of quasi‐pure coconut protein, which the interaction of the functional group other than amine was neglected, it was obvious that the J * was highest at pH 9.0 due to the strong electrical repulsive interaction between both protein–protein and protein–membrane (ζ‐potential of −36.47 mV for protein, and −66.20 mV for membrane). These interactions hindered the agglomeration, enhanced the solubility, and reduced the particle size of the protein molecules (Figure 7d), thus the deposition of the proteins on the membrane surface was substantially decreased (Lee et al, ). However, the small particles were easier to be clogged in the membrane pore since the R p obtained at pH 9.0 was highest (Table ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and π-π interactions are reported to play key roles in CNT/protein binding. Although there are studies suggesting π-π interactions stacking interactions as the main driving force for protein/CNT binding [17,18], the significance of electrostatic interactions in protein binding with single-and multi-walled CNTs has also been reported [19][20][21]. To evaluate the efficacy of EUF CNT-polymer composite membranes in improving membrane performance in protein processing, a study of the effects of upstream protein/CNT binding on the protein transmission through the downstream UF membrane is required.…”
Section: Fig 1 Schematic View Of Crossflow Electroultrafiltration Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and π-π interactions are reported to play key roles in CNT/protein binding. Although there are studies suggesting π-π interactions stacking interactions as the main driving force for protein/CNT binding [17,18], the significance of electrostatic interactions in protein binding with single-and multi-walled CNTs has also been reported [19][20][21]. To evaluate the efficacy of EUF CNT-polymer composite membranes in improving membrane performance in protein As can be seen, unlike electroultrafiltration processes with electrodes on each side of the membrane, the external electric field terminates with the poly(vinyl-alcohol)-carbon nanotube layer, which is upstream of the semipermeable, polymeric membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%