New Insights into Innovation: The Business Model Approach and Chesbrough's Seminal Contribution to Open Innovation

Rodet-Kroichvili, Nathalie; Cabaret, Katy; Picard, Fabienne

doi:10.3917/jie.015.0079

Cited by 13 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 38 publications

(40 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Companies use different IP assets to develop competitive advantages [26,117]. From the business model perspective, patents, brands (trademarks), copyrights, data, and know-how are part of sustainable products, services, and/or technologies [26,118]. As discussed in the R&D section, IP assets are difficult to develop and therefore many companies have strong IP protection, as in the case of Lion Trunk Technology to protect its green technology to clean polluted air (see example in Section 3.3.2).…”

Section: Ip Pooling Pledging and Sharing Through Open Innovation Refers To The Case When Companiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Intellectual Property and Sustainable Business Models: The SBM-IP Canvas

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Companies attempt to address global sustainability challenges through innovating products, services, and business models. This paper focuses on sustainable business model (SBM) innovations as a way to systemically transform businesses towards sustainability. It has been widely recognized that strategic approaches to using intellectual property (IP) need to be aligned with business model innovation for commercial success. Here we suggest that IP, aligned with SBMs, can also be used to create not only commercial, but also societal and environmental impact. Knowledge about how to best align IP with SBMs to drive sustainability transitions remains limited. We address this gap by developing an SBM-IP canvas that integrates IP considerations into each of the SBM canvas building blocks. We do this by employing relevant theoretical concepts from three literature streams, namely the business model (including SBM), IP, and innovation literature. We use case examples to illustrate different IP considerations that are relevant for the SBM-IP building blocks. These examples show that different IP types (e.g., patents, trademarks) and ways of using them (e.g., more or less restrictive licensing) are applied by companies in relation to the different building blocks. While covering new theoretical ground, the proposed SBM-IP canvas can help decision makers understand how they can use different IP types strategically to propose, create, deliver, and capture sustainable value for society, environment, and the business.

show abstract

Section: Ip Pooling Pledging and Sharing Through Open Innovation Refers To The Case When Companiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Intellectual Property and Sustainable Business Models: The SBM-IP Canvas

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Closed innovation embraces exclusive control over all steps in the process of delivering an invention to market because all steps are performed within each commercial producer firm that vertically integrates upstream through downstream stages of the value chain. 44 In the closed innovation model, a producers' R&D investment is recouped through the sale of products and services with supracompetitive prices that are enabled by the patent monopoly. 45 Chesbrough's paradigm predates the publication of his book.…”

Section: Open Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patents for Sharing

Takenaka

2019

MTLR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spurred by the Internet, emerging technologies have changed the way commercial firms innovate and have made it possible for individuals to play an important role in that innovation. Producers in the Information Communication Technologies (ICT), and other sectors dealing with complex technologies with many separately patentable components, find it increasingly difficult to make products without infringing on patents held by others. Numerous overlapping patents often cover such products. Producers have developed a new way to use patents: as inclusive rights for sharing their technologies with others through cross-licensing and other private ordering arrangements in order to ensure the freedom to operate and innovate. Individual innovators, and open source software (“OSS”) programmers in particular, have also developed a new use of copyrights: using them to share their technologies through OSS licenses. Producers of complex technologies use patents for sharing their technologies with OSS programmers and for protecting themselves from patent assertion. In light of these recent uses, this article proposes a new utilitarian theory for patents: patents as the incentive to share, with the reward of increasing the freedom to operate and innovate. It argues that both the ex ante and ex post incentive to invent theories are outdated because they fail to take into account the patent owners’ lack of control over their products in complex technology sectors. This article urges Congress to reevaluate U.S. patent rights in light of this new patent use. It reviews U.S. patents as property rights from the comparative law perspective and proposes the revitalization of the inclusive side of U.S. patents by introducing a compulsory license for blocking patents. It also proposes that the exclusive side of patent rights should be limited to private and experimental use exceptions to ensure the freedom to operate and innovate by sharing.

show abstract

“…Even though the origins of the term "business model" can be traced back to the 50s and 60s, it rose to prominence toward the end of the 20 th Century with the advent of the Internet as a new means to create, distribute and capture value (Zott et al, 2011;Teece 2010;Gunzel, Holm, 2013;Rodet-Kroichvili et al, 2014). In spite of lacking a common definition (Verstraete et al, 2012), there is a growing consensus around the notion that business models are a conceptual link between strategy, business organization and systems to create, deliver and capture value (Osterwalder, Pigneur, 2010;Johnson et al, 2008).…”

Section: Literature Background Business Models and Business Model Art...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Business Model Canvas Acceptance among French Entrepreneurship Students: Principles for Enhancing Innovation Artefacts in Business Education

Lima¹,

Baudier²

2017

Journal of Innovation Economics &Amp; Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour De Boeck Supérieur. © De Boeck Supérieur. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écrit de l'éditeur, en dehors des cas prévus par la législation en vigueur en France. Il est précisé que son stockage dans une base de données est également interdit.

show abstract

New Insights into Innovation: The Business Model Approach and Chesbrough's Seminal Contribution to Open Innovation

Cited by 13 publications

References 38 publications

Integrating Intellectual Property and Sustainable Business Models: The SBM-IP Canvas

Integrating Intellectual Property and Sustainable Business Models: The SBM-IP Canvas

Patents for Sharing

Business Model Canvas Acceptance among French Entrepreneurship Students: Principles for Enhancing Innovation Artefacts in Business Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About