1975
DOI: 10.1080/01944367508977689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Farmland Preservation Programs in New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New York's Agricultural Districting Program Conklin, 1975, Conklin andBryant, 1974) is the best example of this multiple incentive type of approach although features of the districting idea can be found in Oregon and Maryland. In New York, farmers may voluntarily work collectively to form a district.…”
Section: (B) Agricultural Districtingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New York's Agricultural Districting Program Conklin, 1975, Conklin andBryant, 1974) is the best example of this multiple incentive type of approach although features of the districting idea can be found in Oregon and Maryland. In New York, farmers may voluntarily work collectively to form a district.…”
Section: (B) Agricultural Districtingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areas subject to rapid urbanization also have low participation rates. The pressures of urbanization are either felt to be too strong to be ameliorated by agricultural districts or too attractive, through land speculation, to be worth the effort of forming a district (Bryant and Conklin, 1975). The area immediately surrounding New York City is an example large enough to show up at the county level.…”
Section: Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, landowners capture financial returns for the appreciation and development potential of their land, and therefore are less likely to oppose the preservation practices. Other counties and regions, such as Spain, Australia, Italy, Japan, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, have also adopted TDR programs (Bryant & Conklin, 1975;McConnell & Walls, 2009;Pruetz & Standridge, 2008;Shih, Chiang, Chang, Chiang, Chang, & Chang, 2017;Hou, Chan, & Li, 2018). Third, the program can be easily tailored to a county's specific market contexts and conditions.…”
Section: Tdr Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States alone, Walls and McCormick (2007) estimated that by 2005, approximately 140 counties adopted a TDR program, and Rick Pruetz counted 254 by 2015 (Pruetz, 2016). Other counties and regions, such as Spain, Australia, Italy, Japan, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, have also adopted TDR programs (Bryant & Conklin, 1975;McConnell & Walls, 2009;Pruetz & Standridge, 2008;Shih, Chiang, Chang, Chiang, Chang, & Chang, 2017;Hou, Chan, & Li, 2018). With TDR programs blossoming around the world, it is important to empirically evaluate how effective they are in meeting one of their key goals-farmland conservation.…”
Section: Tdr Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most states have developed new tion of their property tax code (Hady, 1970 ; Hady mechanisms for the management of critical areas and Sibold, 1974), usually in the form of preferential such as coastlines, wetlands and uplands involving tax assessment for farmers although some states have the use of acquisition (direct public purchase), widened the application to protect open space and conservation, and scenic easements (Jordahl, 1963 ; recreational land . Two recent attempts to assess in Smith, 1971), regulation (zoning and subdivision detail the effect of particular state programmes are controls) (Delafons, 1969 ;Andrews, 1972), and provided by Bryant and Conklin (1975) and transfer of development rights (Woodbury, 1975) . Gustafson and Wallace (1975) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%