1996
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00187-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New developments concerning piezoelectric materials with defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this subsection, the impermeable assumption is adopted due to the fact that the dielectric constants of piezoelectrics are three orders of magnitude higher than that of air or vacuum inside the void. As suggested by Sosa and Khutoryansky [27], a slender ellipse (e.g. a 0 /b 0 = 100) could be reasonably approximated by the impermeable assumption.…”
Section: Impermeable Elliptical Voidsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this subsection, the impermeable assumption is adopted due to the fact that the dielectric constants of piezoelectrics are three orders of magnitude higher than that of air or vacuum inside the void. As suggested by Sosa and Khutoryansky [27], a slender ellipse (e.g. a 0 /b 0 = 100) could be reasonably approximated by the impermeable assumption.…”
Section: Impermeable Elliptical Voidsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The two assumptions are the upper and lower limits of the exact electric boundary conditions [27,28]. In this subsection, a special set of Trefftz functions are derived for arbitrarily oriented permeable sharp cracks, see Figure 1(b).…”
Section: Permeable Sharp Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous works, the impermeable boundary condition is assumed. Sosa & Khutoryansky (1996) applied the exact boundary conditions to expand the study developed by Sosa (1991), concluding that the impermeable boundary condition is unacceptable when the elliptic hole tends to a crack. The same conclusion was numerically obtained by Pérez-Aparicio et al (2007), using the finite element method.…”
Section: Piezoelectric Ceramics 76mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cracks with inside electric field. A more refined model for real flaws in electroelastic bodies is that in which an inside electric field is allowed in the cavity (e.g., Sosa and Khutoryansky 1996). In this case, the interface boundary conditions become C + <t>i = u?+u4= u\ …”
Section: Rigid Inclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%