1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0953-7562(09)80642-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New components of the chitinolytic system of Trichoderma harzianum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
71
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The protein size revealed by SDS-PAGE for T. harzianum BIO10671 was 42 kDA which was larger than the purified chitinase collected by Deane et al [6] from T. harzianum T198, but similar to the range of endochitinases reported previously by Ulhoa and Peberdy [21], Haran et al [8] and Matsumiya et al [14]. The molecular weight of purified chitinase may differ between species and also within species [19] and it is not known whether they are differently processed gene products from the same gene or from separate genes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The protein size revealed by SDS-PAGE for T. harzianum BIO10671 was 42 kDA which was larger than the purified chitinase collected by Deane et al [6] from T. harzianum T198, but similar to the range of endochitinases reported previously by Ulhoa and Peberdy [21], Haran et al [8] and Matsumiya et al [14]. The molecular weight of purified chitinase may differ between species and also within species [19] and it is not known whether they are differently processed gene products from the same gene or from separate genes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Haran et al (1995) reported an N-acetylglucosaminidase of 102 kDa (CHIT 102) which was expressed by T. haqianwm strain TM when grown on chitin as the sole carbon source. They assumed it to be essentially the same enzyme described by Ulhoa & Peberdy (1991) and the different estimates of its molecular mass were suggested to be the result of the different procedures used.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mycoparasitism by T. harzianum is a complex process, involving recognition of the host, attachment to the mycelium, coiling around the hyphae, partial degradation of the cell wall and penetration of the host mycelium (Elad et al, 1983a, b;Benhamou and Chet, 1993). Cell wall degradation is achieved by six chitin-induced chitinolytic enzymes (comprising two B-1, 4-N-acetylglucoseaminidases and four endochitinases), all of which are required for effective parasitism (Haran et al, 1995). Once, the host mycelium has been penetrated, additional extracellular enzymes such as lipases and proteases are produced to induce degradation of the cell contents .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antagonism by T. harzianum depends on mycoparasitism rather than antibiosis, as evident from the relatively slight inhibition of mycelial growth of R. solani, particularly AG-3; in dual culture (Shternshis, 2002). Besides, being an aggressive mycoparasite (Elad et al, 1983b;Benhamou and Chet, 1993;Haran et al, 1995;Elad et al, 1982;Chet and Baker, 1981), T. harzianum is also known to enhance plant growth in the absence of any pathogens, probably by producing plant growth promoting metabolites in the rhizosphere (Chang et al, 1986;Kleifeld and Chet, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%