1975
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.11.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New approach to the positron distribution in metals and alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
21
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our DB results show no evidence of e+ localization near transition metal solutes of effective negative charge in Cu and Ni of the kind suggested by the Cu alloy ACAR results of Doyama et a1 [4]. Such an effect, if it exists, is smaller than the reproducibility of our measurements.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our DB results show no evidence of e+ localization near transition metal solutes of effective negative charge in Cu and Ni of the kind suggested by the Cu alloy ACAR results of Doyama et a1 [4]. Such an effect, if it exists, is smaller than the reproducibility of our measurements.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Fig. 4 Comparison of our 'spin polarized' DB results to the 2D ACAR results of Genoud et al for a Ni (001) single crystals along the [I001 direction. In both cases data are represented as the difference between 2 spectra acquired with an applied magnetic fieId directed along and opposite to the flight direction of incoming et.…”
Section: Comparison Of Db and Acar Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…В [20,21] теория возмущений строилась на базисе ячеечных волновых функций, а ψ c (r) выбиралась в виде плоской волны. В [22] использовалось разложение ψ c (r) по плоским волнам в кристалле. В нашем случае внимание акценти-ровано на граничных условиях для ψ c (r) на поверхности, что приводит к дискретному энергетическому спектру частицы.…”
Section: теория возмущений в ячеечном приближенииunclassified
“…Provided that the positron affinity of such particles is lower than that of the matrix, positrons may get trapped in them. This effect was first observed experimentally about 25 years ago [1] and described from the theoretical point of view by several authors [2,3], but until recently [4,5] an effective computational method to determine the positron response from nanoparticles was missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%