2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaad07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron Star Natal Kick and Jets in Core Collapse Supernovae

Abstract: We measure the angle between the neutron star (NS) natal kick direction and the inferred direction of jets according to the morphology of 12 core collapse supernova remnants (SNR), and find that the distribution is almost random, but missing small angles. The 12 SNRs are those for which we could both identify morphological features that we can attribute to jets and for which the direction of the NS natal kick is given in the literature. Unlike some claims for spin-kick alignment, here we rule out jet-kick alig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
20
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
(149 reference statements)
8
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4. The new addition of SNR 0540-69.3 is compatible with the conclusion of Bear & Soker (2018a) and strengthens it.…”
Section: A Point-symmetric Morphologysupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4. The new addition of SNR 0540-69.3 is compatible with the conclusion of Bear & Soker (2018a) and strengthens it.…”
Section: A Point-symmetric Morphologysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…I also note that the transverse component of the natal kick velocity of the pulsar that I deduce here is almost opposite to the direction that Serafimovich et al ( 2005) argued for and that was refuted by Mignani et al (2010). Bear & Soker (2018a) present the distribution of the projected angles α between the jets' axis and the NS kick velocity for 12 SNRs. They conclude that the cumulative distribution function fits the random distribution (kick velocity is random with respect to the main jet-axis) at large angles, and is missing systems with small angles relative to the random distribution.…”
Section: A Point-symmetric Morphologycontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…We also note that other mechanisms have been proposed to explain the single NS velocities observed (e.g. Bear & Soker 2018)…”
Section: The Feasibility Of Our Best-fit α and β Valuesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…From the magnitude of the velocity alone we can rule out binary disruption (Iben & Tutukov 1996;Fryer et al 1998). Some jet models predict large scale morphological distortions in the SNR along the axis defined by the pulsar's proper motion (Bear & Soker 2018). This is not seen in the case of SNR CTB 1 which is remarkably circularly symmetric in both optical Hα and non-thermal radio.…”
Section: Psr J0002+6216 and Pulsar Kick Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 91%