2013
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/10/3227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron measurements with ultra-thin 3D silicon sensors in a radiotherapy treatment room using a Siemens PRIMUS linac

Abstract: The accurate detection and dosimetry of neutrons in mixed and pulsed radiation fields is a demanding instrumental issue with great interest both for the industrial and medical communities. In recent studies of neutron contamination around medical linacs, there is a growing concern about the secondary cancer risk for radiotherapy patients undergoing treatment in photon modalities at energies greater than 6 MV. In this work we present a promising alternative to standard detectors with an active method to measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This equivalence does not depend on the primary photon field energy, since the out-of-axis photon spectrum is invariably composed by photons below 0.5 MeV (D'Mellow et al, 2007;Chofor et al, 2012). In addition, due to the high neutron capture cross section of 10 B, the borated rubber acts as an efficient neutron absorber (Guardiola et al, 2013; http:// www.johncaunt.com/shielding/neutron-shielding/jc238/), with a nominal thermal neutron transmission factor of 3.8  10 À 3 . Two layers of Flex-boron s (dimensions 0.32 cm  5 cm  20 cm) were used to shield on both sides the detectors used here.…”
Section: The Borated Rubbermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This equivalence does not depend on the primary photon field energy, since the out-of-axis photon spectrum is invariably composed by photons below 0.5 MeV (D'Mellow et al, 2007;Chofor et al, 2012). In addition, due to the high neutron capture cross section of 10 B, the borated rubber acts as an efficient neutron absorber (Guardiola et al, 2013; http:// www.johncaunt.com/shielding/neutron-shielding/jc238/), with a nominal thermal neutron transmission factor of 3.8  10 À 3 . Two layers of Flex-boron s (dimensions 0.32 cm  5 cm  20 cm) were used to shield on both sides the detectors used here.…”
Section: The Borated Rubbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since dosimetric methods for photon doses are well-known Taddei et al, 2013), our group has focused on the neutron component, and established a methodology to estimate peripheral neutron doses (Sánchez-Doblado et al, 2012;Expósito et al, 2013;Romero-Expósito et al, 2015;VazquezLuque et al, 2013). Although this procedure was developed for a particular thermal neutron detector (Gómez et al, 2010), could be applicable to any other (Guardiola et al, 2013;Bedogni et al, 2014). Specifically, one of these detectors, named TNRD (Thermal Neutron Rate Detector), designed and developed by Bedogni et al, was characterized for peripheral neutron dose measurements in radiotherapy environments, according to the methodology described in Sánchez-Doblado et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, current techniques measure LET use tissue-equivalent proportional counters, 4 solid-state spectrometers, 5 and other methods. [6][7][8] Preliminary proof of principle studies 9,10 used a BANG gel to explore the possibility of measuring LET over extended volumes. This study discusses a possible method to measure the LET deposited by a proton beam over extended areas using a film dosimeter (radiochromic Gafchromic EBT2 film).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SND calculation used the registered images of the absolute planned dose and the detected dose and then related to the LET according to Eq. (8). To validate this approach, Monte Carlo simulations (magenta in Figure 2) were generated to emulate the experimental setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported efficiency was of 6.3% for a single layer compared the 4.90% obtained with a reference planar detector. Among other interesting devices based on micro-machining are ultra thin 3D sensors with a planar converter coating ( 10 B 4 C) proposed by CNM Barcelona (Spain) to minimize the γ-ray sensitivity [20][21] [22]. Moreover, SINTEF (Oslo, Norway) developed sensors with pyramidal grooves with a relative efficiency of up to 38% higher compared to planar [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%