1996
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4526(95)00951-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neutron diffraction and reflectivity studies of the Cr Néel transition in Fe/Cr (001) superlattices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This differs from the experimental results of Fe/Cr(001), whose T N (D) decreases with dropping D [252,253], which could be induced by the spinfrustration effect in the vicinity of the rough Fe/Cr(001) interfaces where the interfacial exchange energy can be minimized only locally and frustration of the interfacial spins occurs since Fe and Cr have magnetical long-range order [252,253].…”
Section: Size Dependence Of the Néel Temperaturecontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This differs from the experimental results of Fe/Cr(001), whose T N (D) decreases with dropping D [252,253], which could be induced by the spinfrustration effect in the vicinity of the rough Fe/Cr(001) interfaces where the interfacial exchange energy can be minimized only locally and frustration of the interfacial spins occurs since Fe and Cr have magnetical long-range order [252,253].…”
Section: Size Dependence Of the Néel Temperaturecontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…(52), (53) can also fit the experimental data of thin CoO, Cr and Ho films [128,232,252,253], it strictly hold only when D is large with the help of the adjustable parameters 0 , and C 0 , D 0 , , respectively, which are case-sensitive without clear physical meaning. Furthermore, above two relationships cannot describe the superheating T N (D) with dropping D [234,251].…”
Section: Size Dependence Of the Néel Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that each layer in the MML can be described by the bulk values of Fe and magnetic Cr and assuming perfect interfaces leads to γ M L = 3.6 mJ/K 2 mol. Using the more realistic non-magnetic value for Cr [8] increases γ M L only slightly to 4.3 mJ/K 2 mol, half of the measured value. The absence of electronic band structure calculation complicates the interpretation of this result: purely electronic effects, effective mass enhancement, presence of other phases with high electronic γ and other type of excitations are hard to separate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In thin films, the magnetic properties of Cr are strongly modified by the stress and the presence of ferromagnetic capping layers as observed by neutron diffraction [4]. In Fe/Cr (001) epitaxial MML, Fullerton et al [8] showed the loss of magnetic long range order in Cr layers for thicknesses t Cr < 42Å. The electronic structure of these thin non-magnetic Cr layers is not well documented in spite of its importance for the calculations of the GMR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Fullerton et al used an empirical formula to describe T N (K) function of Ho 18 and Cr thin films. 19,20 More recently, Jiang et al adapted their model of melting point suppression to the T C (or T N ) of the nanomaterials. 21,22 They also consider that the value of ∆T N (K)/T N (∞) is equal to ∆T C (K)/T C (∞).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%