2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroethics Questions to Guide Ethical Research in the International Brain Initiatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2017, the NRRIC was charged with the development of national priorities for ensuring an environment of responsible research and innovation across all areas of brain research. The committee recognized that neuroinnovation creates a number of ethical tensions that need to be balanced to realize the promise of neuroscience: these tensions capture the five neuroethical questions for neuroscientists (NeQNs) identified at the 2017 Global Neuroethics Summit (Rommelfanger et al, 2018). Here, we address these questions and outline a neuroethical framework being developed for the Australian Brain Initiative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In 2017, the NRRIC was charged with the development of national priorities for ensuring an environment of responsible research and innovation across all areas of brain research. The committee recognized that neuroinnovation creates a number of ethical tensions that need to be balanced to realize the promise of neuroscience: these tensions capture the five neuroethical questions for neuroscientists (NeQNs) identified at the 2017 Global Neuroethics Summit (Rommelfanger et al, 2018). Here, we address these questions and outline a neuroethical framework being developed for the Australian Brain Initiative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recognizing the importance of neuroethics for brain science and technology, Chinese scientists and ethicists have been advocating for the integration of ethical, legal, and social issues into the planning phases and future implementation of the China Brain Project. We assessed the five neuroethics questions for neuroscientists (NeQNs) proposed at the 2017 Global Neuroethics Summit (October 17 and 18, 2017, Daegu City, Korea) (Rommelfanger et al, 2018) in the context of traditional Chinese culture and juxtaposed the legacy of Confucianism with contemporary thinking. In this paper, we summarize ethical issues more relevant to the China Brain Project and explain our plans to address them.…”
Section: Neuroethics Is An Integral Part Of the Developing China Braimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A global perspective is therefore essential for neuroethics. Among the issues requiring a global perspective is the coordination of large-scale neuroscience research programs (Amadio et al 2018;Grillner et al 2016), the governance of ethically controversial brain-related research and interventions, the impact of AI-driven research and innovation in neuroscience and neurotechnology (Yuste et al 2017), and the need for an inclusive vision in understanding and responding to the neurological and mental health impact of the critical global challenge of environmental changes (Cabrera et al 2016).…”
Section: Toward a Global Neuroethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%