IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Comp Architecture 2012
DOI: 10.1109/hpca.2012.6169047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network congestion avoidance through Speculative Reservation

Abstract: Congestion caused by hot-spot traffic can significantly degrade the performance of a computer network. In this study, we present the Speculative Reservation Protocol (SRP), a new network congestion control mechanism that relieves the effect of hot-spot traffic in high bandwidth, low latency, lossless computer networks. Compared to existing congestion control approaches like Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN), which react to network congestion through packet marking and rate throttling, SRP takes a proactiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [16] and [17] the authors propose several reservation mechanism for dragonflies, which avoid congestion by pre-reserving bandwidth for each flow. Alternative proposals include the use of dynamically allocated side-buffers in the network switches [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [16] and [17] the authors propose several reservation mechanism for dragonflies, which avoid congestion by pre-reserving bandwidth for each flow. Alternative proposals include the use of dynamically allocated side-buffers in the network switches [9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRP uses speculative packets to mitigate the requestgrant round-trip latency under low and medium loads, as proposed by SRP [28]. Each flow initiates packet transmission speculatively without a grant.…”
Section: Protocol Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ECN can be effective [37,21], it is also considerably sensitive to its configuration parameters which depend on numerous and sometimes unpredictable factors, including the traffic pattern [37]. Past work has also highlighted ECN's slow adaptation to changes in the traffic pattern [15,28]. This is based on ECN's reactive nature, since ECN acts only after congestion forms, which is also true for TCP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, low-latency datacenter-wide networks [22] and faster storage (e.g., Flash) have turned many I/O-bound workloads into compute-bound, often making compute the major source of latency [40,43]. Second, single-node latencies must be small and tightly distributed, since servicing each user request involves hundreds to thousands of nodes, and the slowest nodes often determine end-to-end latency.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%