Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2503210.2503213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Channel reservation protocol for over-subscribed channels and destinations

Abstract: Channels in system-wide networks tend to be over-subscribed due to the cost of bandwidth and increasing traffic demands. To make matters worse, workloads can overstress specific destinations, creating hotspots. Lossless networks offer attractive advantages compared to lossy networks but suffer from tree saturation. This led to the development of explicit congestion notification (ECN). However, ECN is very sensitive to its configuration parameters and acts only after congestion forms. We propose channel reserva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other main class of congestion management is based on reservation such as Speculative reservation protocol (SRP) [17], channel reservation protocol (CRP) [24], Small-Message SRP (SMSRP) and Last-Hop Reservation Protocol (LHRP) [18]. SRP proposed by Jiang, et al is designed to avoid hot-spot congestion, but the traffic schedule based on network status information is not always available.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other main class of congestion management is based on reservation such as Speculative reservation protocol (SRP) [17], channel reservation protocol (CRP) [24], Small-Message SRP (SMSRP) and Last-Hop Reservation Protocol (LHRP) [18]. SRP proposed by Jiang, et al is designed to avoid hot-spot congestion, but the traffic schedule based on network status information is not always available.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many congestion control mechanisms have been proposed to resolve network congestion. SRP [17], CRP [24] and SMSRP [18] share the similar strategy that reserving network resources for each flow transmission to avoid congestion, but their implementation is too complex. Other class of congestion control is mainly about adaptive routing algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative implementations may rely on congestion avoidance at the transport level (such as TCP congestion control) or on the use of proactive reservations to avoid saturating the network, such as SRP, 34 CRP, 35 SMSRP, and LHRP. Alternative implementations may rely on congestion avoidance at the transport level (such as TCP congestion control) or on the use of proactive reservations to avoid saturating the network, such as SRP, 34 CRP, 35 SMSRP, and LHRP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Injection throttling might be handled using the original QCN implementation or any other ECN mechanism, by identifying CNMs generated by endpoints and not intercepting them in the network switches. Alternative implementations may rely on congestion avoidance at the transport level (such as TCP congestion control) or on the use of proactive reservations to avoid saturating the network, such as SRP, CRP, SMSRP, and LHRP …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the gradual deployment of ExpressPass into DCNs is a visible task in the future. Nonetheless, deploying credit-based protocols [14,15] like ExpressPass in DCNs will bring many challenges to the fairness of bandwidth allocation, especially in multitenant DCNs [25,26] . We show in Section 2 that simply mixing ExpressPass with reactive protocols deployed in real DCNs will cause serious trouble.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%