1995
DOI: 10.1016/0923-2516(96)80598-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nested RT-PCR for detection of sandfly fever virus, serotype Toscana, in clinical specimens, with confirmation by nucleotide sequence analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, serological diagnosis is hampered by antigenic cross-reactivity between some members of the group [Tesh et al, 1982;Schwarz et al, 1996b], which may make interpretation of the antibody tests more difficult. In addition, virus isolation is time-consuming, less sensitive, and involves higher biosafety requirements than diagnosis based on viral genome amplification [Schwarz et al, 1995c;Valassina et al, 1996;Braito et al, 1998a]. Molecular methods are often extremely sensitive when reference strains are assayed, but genome variability has to be considered for the design of sensitive diagnostic tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, serological diagnosis is hampered by antigenic cross-reactivity between some members of the group [Tesh et al, 1982;Schwarz et al, 1996b], which may make interpretation of the antibody tests more difficult. In addition, virus isolation is time-consuming, less sensitive, and involves higher biosafety requirements than diagnosis based on viral genome amplification [Schwarz et al, 1995c;Valassina et al, 1996;Braito et al, 1998a]. Molecular methods are often extremely sensitive when reference strains are assayed, but genome variability has to be considered for the design of sensitive diagnostic tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More information is, therefore, needed in order to design efficient molecular diagnostic assays. However, some PCR tests have also been developed and have been shown to be useful for diagnosis of TOSV and RVFV infections [Schwarz et al, 1995c;Valassina et al, 1996;Ibrahim et al, 1997;Garcia et al, 2001;Sall et al, 2001]. With the aim of improving the molecular diagnosis of phlebovirus infections, the genetic variability of some Spanish TOSV isolates and of some other phlebovirus strains has been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular and biological variability among phleboviruses has been studied for RVF virus (Battles & Dalrymple, 1988 ;Anderson & Peters, 1988 ;Saluzzo et al, 1989 ;Besselar et al, 1991) and to a lesser extent for Toscana virus (Schwarz et al, 1995). These reports indicated that among natural isolates of RVF virus, the antigenic properties of the glycoproteins and the nucleoprotein appeared to be stable, and sequences of the G2 epitopes in the M segment are relatively conserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to 2005, all studies were performed with classic PCR detection based on single round or nested protocols [21,37,56,57] . The description of two genotypes of TOSV supports the need of special attention when designing primers and probes in order to avoid false negative results [58] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%