1990
DOI: 10.1063/1.346442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative capacitance at metal-semiconductor interfaces

Abstract: A negative capacitance effect has been observed in metal-semiconductor contacts. This phenomenon is explained by considering the loss of interface charge at occupied states below Fermi level due to impact ionization. A modified Shockley–Read treatment is proposed to interpret the experimental observations. In particular, a two-energy-level simplified model is presented to simulate the capacitance spectrum. The results are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
81
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, negative capacitances have been reported on a variety of devices that were based on organic materials [1][2][3][4] or on crystalline or amorphous inorganic semiconductors. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Equally numerous explanations for this negative capacitance ͑NC͒ have been presented that involved minority carrier flow, 1,[3][4][5] interface states, 9,13 slow transient time of injected carriers, 14 charge trapping, 2,3,[10][11][12] or space charge. 6 The bulk of these descriptions are either based on phenomenological arguments or based on device representation in an equivalent circuit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, negative capacitances have been reported on a variety of devices that were based on organic materials [1][2][3][4] or on crystalline or amorphous inorganic semiconductors. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Equally numerous explanations for this negative capacitance ͑NC͒ have been presented that involved minority carrier flow, 1,[3][4][5] interface states, 9,13 slow transient time of injected carriers, 14 charge trapping, 2,3,[10][11][12] or space charge. 6 The bulk of these descriptions are either based on phenomenological arguments or based on device representation in an equivalent circuit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 were observed with increasing forward applied voltage for all frequencies. The physical mechanisms of the negative capacitance in different devices have been associated with the contact injection, interface states or minority-carrier injection [19,20]. Wu et al stated that the negative capacitance can be explained by considering the loss of interface charge at occupied states below the Fermi level due to impact ionization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, NC behavior is important because it implies that the increment of bias voltage produces a decrease in the charge on the electrodes [14]. According to Wu, et al [13] the concept of NC can be explained by considering the loss of interface charge at occupied states below Fermi level due to impact ionization. The physical mechanism of the NC in different devices is different and can be attributed to the contact injection, interface states or minority-carrier injection [9,12,13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the existence of an insulator layer, native or deposited at metalsemiconductor (MS) interface, changes the C-V and G/ω characteristics of the diode. Negative capacitance (NC) and anomalous peak have been observed in the forward bias C-V characteristics of MS or MIS SBDs [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The NC has been attributed to the interface states, the contact injection and minority carrier injection effects * corresponding author; e-mail: farukozdemir@sdu.edu.tr and the anomalous peak can occur due to interface states (N ss ) and R s [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation