2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural regeneration and recruitment of native Quercus robur and introduced Q. rubra in European oak-pine mixed forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the age of high interest in forest ecosystem services (Maes et al 2012;Dickie et al 2014;Felipe-Lucia et al 2018), and discussion about usage of alien tree species as alternatives to native species (Thurm et al 2018;Jandl et al 2019) which are susceptible to climate change, our results clearly indicate disruption of ecosystem services provided by an important understory plant. Similarly to other studies of Q. rubra effects on biodiversity (Woziwoda et al 2014a;Chmura 2020), ecosystem services (Woziwoda et al 2019b) and natural regeneration of native woody species (Woziwoda et al 2019a), we argue that regardless of land-use legacy, introduction of habitat-modifying tree species (transformers sensu Richardson et al 2000) lead to decline in abundance of species crucial for ecosystem functioning. Therefore, for conservation of delivery of ecosystem services, we suggest limiting the introduction of Q. rubra in areas with abundant V. vitis-idaea, especially in forests with continuous land-use history.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In the age of high interest in forest ecosystem services (Maes et al 2012;Dickie et al 2014;Felipe-Lucia et al 2018), and discussion about usage of alien tree species as alternatives to native species (Thurm et al 2018;Jandl et al 2019) which are susceptible to climate change, our results clearly indicate disruption of ecosystem services provided by an important understory plant. Similarly to other studies of Q. rubra effects on biodiversity (Woziwoda et al 2014a;Chmura 2020), ecosystem services (Woziwoda et al 2019b) and natural regeneration of native woody species (Woziwoda et al 2019a), we argue that regardless of land-use legacy, introduction of habitat-modifying tree species (transformers sensu Richardson et al 2000) lead to decline in abundance of species crucial for ecosystem functioning. Therefore, for conservation of delivery of ecosystem services, we suggest limiting the introduction of Q. rubra in areas with abundant V. vitis-idaea, especially in forests with continuous land-use history.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In managed forests, such as dense Q. rubra monoculture in Germany, density can reach 240,000 individuals/ha (Major et al, 2013). Our studies revealed that densities of Q. rubra are highest beneath maternal trees (Dyderski & Jagodziński, 2018a; Jagodziński, Dyderski, et al, 2018; Woziwoda, Dyderski, Kobus, Parzych, & Jagodziński, 2019). Increasing shade from Q. rubra during its development inhibits natural regeneration of other species; thus older forest stands tend to be either monospecific or Q. rubra or to have very little of it.…”
Section: Response To Environmentmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Poland) widespread planting of Red Oak for commercial purposes has ceased. However, the existing mature trees and stands already constitute sufficient seed sources for self‐reproduction and spontaneous spread of Q. rubra (Dyderski & Jagodziński, 2018a; Jagodziński, Dyderski, et al, 2018; Woziwoda et al, 2019). However, despite being invasive, its current environmental impact, in comparison with other alien tree species, is not serious enough for it to be designated for eradication.…”
Section: Conservation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of oak natural regeneration depends on many factors, namely on a quantity of oak in the stand and its age, relative density of stocking, seed yield of acorns, a sufficient warmth, moisture, and finally light and development of the shrub and grass layers (Ikauniece et al, 2012;Vizoso-Arribe et al, 2014;Muhamed et al, 2015;Woziwoda et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%