2004
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.632.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural and Artificial Pollination of Atemoya in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further greater TSS:TA ratio in 2003 was attributable to higher TSS values, which means the fruit pulp was more sweet and less sour during 2003. In the hand-pollinated atemoya fruits in Brazil, Melo et al (2004) recorded a smaller TSS:TA ratio (37.2 to 49.8), whereas those recorded by us were quite high (81.1 to 150.6). This could be attributed primarily to the pulp quality characteristic of the atemoya variety studied by them.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further greater TSS:TA ratio in 2003 was attributable to higher TSS values, which means the fruit pulp was more sweet and less sour during 2003. In the hand-pollinated atemoya fruits in Brazil, Melo et al (2004) recorded a smaller TSS:TA ratio (37.2 to 49.8), whereas those recorded by us were quite high (81.1 to 150.6). This could be attributed primarily to the pulp quality characteristic of the atemoya variety studied by them.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The previous workers depending on pollen treatment in different Annona spp. have reported variable effects on fruit set: 1) in A. cherimola, set was 84% to 96% with self-pollen but with mixed pollen, it was 38% to 69% (Richardson and Anderson, 1996); 46.6% when self-pollen was used but with atemoya pollen, it was 4.7% (Duarte and Escobar, 1998); 2) in A. atemoya with A. squamosa pollen, the set was 80.5% (Melo et al, 2004); 3) in A. squamosa, set was 90.9% to 100% with self-pollen (Cogez and Lyannaz, 1996); and 4) in A. muricata, set ranged from 31.2% to 37.5% (Khalid, 1992). Kahn et al (1994) showed that both maternal and paternal parents have significant effects on percentage of fruit set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation