National Features of Forming a Digital Economy in Russia

Гуреев, П. М.; Degtyareva, V. V.; Prokhorova, I. S.

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39319-9_2

Cited by 17 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the same time, if we compare agriculture and other areas of activity, we can conclude that, the volume of costs in agriculture is about 13 times less compared to industrial production. However, there are industries where the amount of domestic expenditure on research and development is less than in agriculture, including construction, communications, services, environmental protection, etc [10][11][12].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the innovative development of agriculture in Russia

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the presented study, an assessment was made of the innovative development of agriculture in the Russian Federation. As part of the study, it was found that innovative development is the effectiveness of the type of activity, which consists in increasing the use of new technologies, saving resources, reducing operating and capital costs, reducing environmental impacts, etc. In this regard, the work analyzed indicators reflecting energy capacity, internal research and development costs and the volume of innovative goods and services. The analyzed indicators indicate that in agriculture there is no tendency to switch to innovative technologies, as a result, the study proposed a model for ensuring the innovative development of agriculture. At the end of the study, conclusions are drawn from the results of the work.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the innovative development of agriculture in Russia

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We consider it necessary to propose a system that allows for the innovative development of agriculture of the Eurasian Economic Union (figure 4) [17][18][19]. Thus, the presented system shows that it is possible to ensure the innovative development of agriculture in the EAEU member states due to the incomplete restructuring of agriculture in all countries, and the adjustment of lagging states to best practices.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of the innovative potential of agriculture of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study is devoted to assessing the innovative potential of agriculture of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union. As part of the work, it was revealed that the Member States of the Union were united in order to ensure sustainable development in the current and strategic perspective. The analyzed agricultural indicators led to the conclusion that the Russian Federation is the absolute leader in terms of gross output and distribution of agricultural products, the Republic of Kazakhstan occupies the second place, and the Republic of Belarus in third place. At the same time, the specific indicator reflecting the collection and production of agricultural products per capita, which indicates the innovative development of agriculture, was analyzed in the work, as a result, it was revealed that the Russian Federation ranks last in terms of certain indicators. In this connection, mechanisms were proposed in the work aimed at increasing the innovative development of agriculture in the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union.

show abstract

“…The digital economy in a country covers information technology, software, mobile communications, and data transmission. There is quite a lot of studies on various aspects of the digital economy in Russia (Akberdina, 2018;Basaev, 2019;Ziyadullaev et al, 2019;Belokurova et al, 2020;Gureev et al, 2020;Vlasov, 2020;Rudyk et al, 2022). The researchers note that the digital economy in Russia is developing at a high pace, transforming industries and markets and penetrating into education and intellectual activity.…”

Section: Digital Economy and Sustainable Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental financing: does digital economy matter?

Akberdina,

Lavrikova,

Vlasov

2024

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable development and ecological restoration are a common goal pursued by countries around the world to mitigate the collision between economic growth and the environment. Digital economy has been rather instrumental in settling this type of conflict. The study is intended to identify the relationship between digital financing and environmental financing by assessing the specificities of their temporal and industry-specific dynamics, as well as to determine the side effects that the digital economy has in terms of current environmental investments and costs. The special attention is paid to the effect of the digital economy on both total environmental financing and its components, namely, environmental investment and current environmental protection costs. The authors come up with two indicators to evaluate the impact of the digital economy, these are digital financing (direct impact) and digital capital (indirect impact). To calculate these indicators, the authors’ own method is developed. The impact of the digital economy on environmental financing was tested using the least squares method with clustering of annual standard deviation and individual fixed effects. The research data were retrieved from the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) of the Russian Federation for 2012–2022. Our findings show that digital financing exerts a significant positive effect on environmental financing, which indicates that two dynamic processes in the economy—digital transformation and introduction of advanced environmental digital technologies—are synchronized. The authors prove that digital investments stimulate a comparable increase in environmental investment due to the effects created by digital technologies penetrating into environmental protection technologies. We demonstrate that the level of digitalization of the population, companies and the state assessed through the digital capital index has a positive effect on environmental financing. The results of the study are of use in the sphere of public policy.

show abstract

National Features of Forming a Digital Economy in Russia

Cited by 17 publications

References 0 publications

Assessment of the innovative development of agriculture in Russia

Assessment of the innovative development of agriculture in Russia

Assessment of the innovative potential of agriculture of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union

Environmental financing: does digital economy matter?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About