2008
DOI: 10.3917/eufor.349.0135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nation-Building in Croatia and the Treatment of Minorities: Rights and Wrongs

Abstract: Résumé Le préambule de la Constitution croate définit la Croatie en tant « qu’État national de la nation Croate et État des membres des minorités nationales autochtones ». Selon une partie des chefs politique serbes du début des années 1990, cette exacte définition encouragea le nationalisme serbe en Croatie et légitima la révolte d’une partie de la population. Bien que la proclamation de l’État-nation ne soit pas nécessairement liée à l’émergence d’un ethno-nationalisme, la déclaration de l’État croate en 199… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a comparative analysis of the CESE region is made relevant by the fact that to our knowledge no comprehensive study has tried to connect these aspects, despite the existence of a broad literature about minority representation, either in the form of case studies (Alionescu 2004;Dobos 2007;Horvath 2001;Komac 2002;Petricusic 2004aPetricusic , 2008Vasiljevic 2004), or of comparative efforts (Bird 2013; Bochsler 2010; Frowein and Bank 2001;Htun 2004;Meier 2009;Reynolds 2005;Venice Commission 2000. The analysis is also motivated by the fact that the specific forms of electoral representation are one of the most important micropolitical techniques that can be deployed as a building block of macropolitical designs of ethnocultural diversity management (Hadden 2005;McGarry and O'Leary 1993;McGarry, O'Leary, and Simeon 2008;Rechel 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a comparative analysis of the CESE region is made relevant by the fact that to our knowledge no comprehensive study has tried to connect these aspects, despite the existence of a broad literature about minority representation, either in the form of case studies (Alionescu 2004;Dobos 2007;Horvath 2001;Komac 2002;Petricusic 2004aPetricusic , 2008Vasiljevic 2004), or of comparative efforts (Bird 2013; Bochsler 2010; Frowein and Bank 2001;Htun 2004;Meier 2009;Reynolds 2005;Venice Commission 2000. The analysis is also motivated by the fact that the specific forms of electoral representation are one of the most important micropolitical techniques that can be deployed as a building block of macropolitical designs of ethnocultural diversity management (Hadden 2005;McGarry and O'Leary 1993;McGarry, O'Leary, and Simeon 2008;Rechel 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Croatia emerged on the international political map only after the dissolution of Yugoslavia in 1990s. The process of nation-building in the country coincided with a war led by nationalist rulers and was fuelled by ethno-mobilisation consisting of e.g., altering history books in schools, changing street names and using sports in the formation and conservation of the emerging national identity and culture (Brentin 2013;Petricusic 2008;Šakaja and Stanić 2011). Creating and maintaining national myths was an efficient tool for political mobilisation (Vangeli 2011), but its effects were not limited to politics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En Croacia la situación fue diferente. De acuerdo con Petricusic (2008), el 16 de marzo de 1991 los serbocroatas autoproclamaron la conformación de la República Serbia de la Krajina y declararon Knin como capital. A la vez, paramilitares serbocroatas, apoyados por el ejército de la antigua Yugoslavia, arremetieron para controlar las fronteras de Croacia con Bosnia y Voivodina, en la denominada Krajina croata.…”
Section: El Conflicto En Croaciaunclassified