Nation as Partnership: Law, “Race,” and Gender in Aotearoa New Zealand's Treaty Settlements

Abstract

This article uses postcolonial theory to analyze the dynamic convergence of two significant international trends in Aotearoa New Zealand: the movement for reparations for historical colonial injustices, and the economic reform process known as “structural adjustment,” or Reaganomics in the United States, which was intended to produce a competitive nation of individual entrepreneurs. It argues that analysis of the interrelationships of law, “race,” gender, and nation in this convergence illuminates the reproduction and reshaping of colonial tropes, or historical racial configurations produced through colonization, in these current trends. In Aotearoa New Zealand, claims by indigenous Maori activists for self‐determination and redress of historical injustices spurred the emergence of alternative imagined communities with the potential to transform the nation. These alternative visions for the nation were shaped and limited by the economic law and policy reform of structural adjustment, producing a new official nationalism of partnership, implemented in settlements of breaches of the Treaty of Waitangi 1840. These partnerships resulted in a new individual identity of Maori men as entrepreneurs in a competitive nation. It produced a symbolic alliance of men across race that silenced and erased Maori activists' demands, and the leadership of Maori women, at the national level. The high profile partnerships, the erasure of Maori women, and relentless media attention to claims of sexism in Maori culture reproduced colonial tropes with images of the “progress” of the partnerships “saving” brown women from the sexism of brown men and “traditional” cultures. In this complex process the settlements were rational exercises of agency by the new Maori entrepreneurs with the goal of achieving economic autonomy, and worked to silence and erase the leadership of Maori women at the national level, even while women continued to be recognized as leaders at the local and regional levels. This analysis suggests that realization of the transformative potential of claims for redress of historical racial injustices requires attention to the repetition of raced and gendered dynamics of imagined communities that shape and limit that potential.

Colonialism and Carceral Motherhood

“…The influence of Christian missionaries during the middle decades of the 19th century and the transplantation of Western notions of law had gendered as well as racialized implications for native and immigrant peoples. Notions of race and gender were intrinsic to the colonial projects of Americans and Europeans (McClintock, 1995;Seuffert, 2005). The structure of the modernized nuclear family and related gender roles were inscribed by Western law on the indigenous populace of Hawai'i as well as on the successive waves of mostly non-White immigrants from Asia and other poor regions of the globe (Merry, 2000).…”

The Messy Practice of Building Women's Human Rights: Truth‐telling and Sexual Violence inGuatemala

“…Many argue that this gap between formal and substantive rights and the difficulty of thinking intersectionally 3 about women and gender are legacies of the liberal legalism that predominates in this field. They offer as alternatives more complex structural analyses of law, rights regimes, and transitional justice (Boesten, 2014;Clarke, 2009;Meertens & Zambrano, 2010;Miller, 2008;Ross, 2003a;Seuffert, 2005;Smith, 2005Smith, , 2006Theidon, 2007).…”

Forgiveness and Reconciliation

“…Establishing peace in a postcolonial era requires healing from sufferings endured and accountability for traumas perpetrated. Postcolonial approaches respond to questions regarding values, assumptions, and practices in a way in which empowerment and accountability are central tenets in the healing process (Hernandez et al, 2005;Seuffert, 2005). These approaches intend to promote balance between self-determination and distributive justice while locating individuals within the concrete realities of communities.…”