2019
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20153806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomaterials as Promising Alternative in the Infection Treatment

Abstract: Both the prevalence of antibiotic resistance and the increased biofilm-associated infections are boosting the demand for new advanced and more effective treatment for such infections. In this sense, nanotechnology offers a ground-breaking platform for addressing this challenge. This review shows the current progress in the field of antimicrobial inorganic-based nanomaterials and their activity against bacteria and bacterial biofilm. Herein, nanomaterials preventing the bacteria adhesion and nanomaterials treat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
(132 reference statements)
1
95
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, hydrophilic nanosystems interact less with opsonins thus, having longer blood circulation compared with hydrophobic nanosystems [22]. Thus, the enhanced actions of nanosystems as antibacterial drug delivery systems arise from various mechanisms, including their ability to optimize the physicochemical characteristics of entrapped antibacterial drugs, their favored accumulation near the cytoplasm, their electrostatic interactions with bacterial membrane, the high oxidizing power and production of reactive oxygen species, the prevention of unwanted interactions and protection of antibacterials against degradation and the better clinical use of antibacterials through more patient acceptable routes [23].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Nanosystems As Antibacterial Drug Delivery Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, hydrophilic nanosystems interact less with opsonins thus, having longer blood circulation compared with hydrophobic nanosystems [22]. Thus, the enhanced actions of nanosystems as antibacterial drug delivery systems arise from various mechanisms, including their ability to optimize the physicochemical characteristics of entrapped antibacterial drugs, their favored accumulation near the cytoplasm, their electrostatic interactions with bacterial membrane, the high oxidizing power and production of reactive oxygen species, the prevention of unwanted interactions and protection of antibacterials against degradation and the better clinical use of antibacterials through more patient acceptable routes [23].…”
Section: Mechanism Of Nanosystems As Antibacterial Drug Delivery Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this present scenario, nanomaterials have emerged as both viable and versatile alternatives to current antibiotics to fight against AMR bacteria as it showed effectiveness in low dosages also where chances of bacteria getting resistance is also less (Regí et al, 2019). The main advantage of nanoparticles as antibacterial agents (i.e., nanoweapons) is that they function via a multiple target approach compared to the single target approach of antibiotics to inhibit the growth of bacteria (Naskar et al, 2016;Baptista et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biofilms are communities of microorganisms embedded in a self-produced polysaccharide matrix [164]. This protective matrix endows them with resistance to antibiotics and host immune systems that, otherwise, would eliminate bacteria in their planktonic state (free-floating bacteria) [165]. The biofilm-related antimicrobial resistance relies, not only on the physical hindrance of the matrix, but also on (1) the presence of bacterial and host DNA and proteins that may increase the shielding capacity of the matrix [166]; (2) the presence of bacteria with different acquired resistances and antibiotic sensitivities [167]; (3) the development of efflux pumps [168]; (4) the presence of enzymes able to degrade antimicrobials [169]; (5) the establishment of quorum sensing (bacteria-bacteria communication) [170].…”
Section: General Concepts On Bacterial Bone Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%