2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b01224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano-“Squeegee” for the Creation of Clean 2D Material Interfaces

Abstract: Two-dimensional (2D) materials exhibit many exciting phenomena that make them promising as materials for future electronic, optoelectronic, and mechanical devices. Because of their atomic thinness, interfaces play a dominant role in determining material behavior. In order to observe and exploit the unique properties of these materials, it is therefore vital to obtain clean and repeatable interfaces. However, the conventional mechanical stacking of atomically thin layers typically leads to trapped contaminants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
193
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
193
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the MoSe2-WSe2 stack was picked up and transferred onto the desired graphite flakes (mechanically exfoliated) followed by nano-squeegee. 28…”
Section: For the Cafm Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the MoSe2-WSe2 stack was picked up and transferred onto the desired graphite flakes (mechanically exfoliated) followed by nano-squeegee. 28…”
Section: For the Cafm Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques such as heating 8 , plasma treatment 9 , laser cleaning 10 , chemical activation 11 , and current-driven cleaning 12 have been tried out and tested. In addition, first steps toward mechanical cleaning have been made using AFM [13][14][15] , but without achieving atomically clean membranes. While some methods (especially aging at elevated temperatures in ultra-high vacuum) have produced reasonable results, there is no control of the size and location of clean areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To guarantee clean hBN/TMD contact, the nano-squeegee method was used with a scan line density of ≥ 10 nm/line and a scan speed of ≤ 30 µm/s as suggested by Rosenberger et al to physically push contaminants out from in between heterostructure interfaces. 33 Results of this procedure can be seen in the atomic force microscope image of Supplementary Fig. S5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%