2019
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201900613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano‐MoO3 for highly selective enrichment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction

Abstract: Nano‐molybdenum trioxide was prepared from nano‐molybdenum disulfide by simple firing in muffle furnace. Nano‐molybdenum trioxide was used as the extraction coating on the stainless steel wire. Four wires were filled in a polyetheretherketone tube to get an extraction tube. The tube was connected to the six‐port valve of a high performance liquid chromatograph, and the online analysis system was constructed. Extraction selectivity of the tube for different types of compounds, including polycyclic aromatic hydr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method exhibits the wider linear range than in-tube SPME-HPLC-DAD method based on ionic liquid-bonded basalt fibers and ZIF-8-PDA-SPME-HPLC-FLD method. Furthermore, it is comparable to Nano-MoO 3 in-tube SPME-HPLC-DAD [16] and diamond nanoparticles-coated in-tube SPME-HPLC-DAD methods [37]. The F E values of this method are larger than some method, but the extraction time is relative less.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The method exhibits the wider linear range than in-tube SPME-HPLC-DAD method based on ionic liquid-bonded basalt fibers and ZIF-8-PDA-SPME-HPLC-FLD method. Furthermore, it is comparable to Nano-MoO 3 in-tube SPME-HPLC-DAD [16] and diamond nanoparticles-coated in-tube SPME-HPLC-DAD methods [37]. The F E values of this method are larger than some method, but the extraction time is relative less.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The development of efficient sorbents is very important for SPME. For several decades, various materials have been applied to the extraction coating such as mesoporous materials [7][8][9], ionic liquids [10,11], carbon materials [12][13][14], metal oxides [15][16][17], aerogels [18,19], metal organic frameworks [20,21], and so on. There are certain common characteristics in excellent extraction coatings such as large specific surface, high adsorption capacity, good selectivity, and well durability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) has significant advantageous over above methods , such as no or less solvent, time‐saving, high sensitivity, convenient combination with chromatographic detection, etc . The extraction performance is mainly decided by the sorbent, so the efficient materials have been developed for SPME, including ionic liquids , metal organic frameworks , covalent organic frameworks , graphene , graphitic carbon nitride , mesoporous materials , and functional nanomaterials . There are some common properties in these high‐performance coatings, such as high surface area, excellent adsorption ability and selectivity, large porousness, good durability, and chemical stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoparticles have attracted great attention due to their unique properties and potential in separation science. Various nanoparticles were applied for solid-phase extraction [1][2][3], solid-phase microextraction [4][5][6][7], removal of pollutants [8,9], and chromatographic stationary phase [10,11]. Carbon nanomaterials like carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene oxide (GO) were used as the stationary phases for gas chromatography (GC), which exhibited excellent separation performance for various organic compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%