2021
DOI: 10.1111/2047-3095.12323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NANDA‐I, NOC, and NIC linkages to SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐19): Part 3. Family response

Abstract: To provide guidance to nurses caring for families with COVID-19, we developed linkages using interoperable standardized nursing terminologies: NANDA International (NANDA-I) nursing diagnoses, Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC), and Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). In addition, we wanted to identify gaps in the terminologies and potential new nursing diagnoses, outcomes, and interventions for future development related to nurse roles in family care during a pandemic. Methods: Using a consensus pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A descriptive study was carried out in six steps from July 2020 to July 2021: (1) preliminary mapping of all relevant NOC outcomes to the SFMF based on team expertise; (2) development of checklists for team members serving as ‘identifiers’ and ‘reviewers’; (3) mapping all relevant NOC outcomes to the SFMF; (4) final agreement on the results of the mapping process; (5) establishment of inter‐rater reliability; and (6) discussion of findings and conclusions with authors of the SFMF. An iterative consensus‐based approach has been used by previous researchers to implement the agreement‐reaching process in group decision‐making for this type of descriptive linkage study (Lucena et al, 2020 ; Moorhead et al, 2021 ; Swanson et al, 2021 ; Wagner et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A descriptive study was carried out in six steps from July 2020 to July 2021: (1) preliminary mapping of all relevant NOC outcomes to the SFMF based on team expertise; (2) development of checklists for team members serving as ‘identifiers’ and ‘reviewers’; (3) mapping all relevant NOC outcomes to the SFMF; (4) final agreement on the results of the mapping process; (5) establishment of inter‐rater reliability; and (6) discussion of findings and conclusions with authors of the SFMF. An iterative consensus‐based approach has been used by previous researchers to implement the agreement‐reaching process in group decision‐making for this type of descriptive linkage study (Lucena et al, 2020 ; Moorhead et al, 2021 ; Swanson et al, 2021 ; Wagner et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The checklists assisted team members in developing a more focused set of linkages to guide nurses in the care of their patients with chronic conditions and their family caregivers. They were developed based on the vast team experience mapping concepts to NOC outcomes (Johnson et al, 2011 ; Lucena et al, 2020 ; Moorhead et al, 2021 ; Swanson et al, 2021 ; Wagner et al, 2022 ). The checklist for identifiers includes five items, for example, ‘Read the definitions and indicators of the nursing outcomes from Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) 6th Edition (2018) you would select with the sub‐category of the SFMF’.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations