“…Fluorescence imaging based on small-molecule fluorescent probes has emerged as one of the most powerful techniques to monitor targets and biological processes in complicated living systems with high temporal and spatial resolution. − Thus, the past couple of years have witnessed much effort toward the development of NAD(P)H fluorescent probes based on various recognition units, including quinolinium, pyridium, resazurin, benzophenoxazine, and quinone. , It is well known that 1-methylquinolinium compounds with electron-withdrawing substituents in the 3-position are readily reduced by NADH analogues to yield 1-methyl-1,4-dihydroquinoline predominantly, − and quinolinium thereby stands out as the most used recognition unit among these designed probes. − Despite the progress in developing NAD(P)H probes, there still exist a few limitations, such as ON–OFF mechanism, slow response rate, dull sensitivity, inapparent fluorescent change, and short-emission wavelength (Table S1). Additionally, to our knowledge, relatively fewer near-infrared (NIR) (650–900 nm) emission fluorescent probes for NAD(P)H have been reported. ,, NIR fluorescent probes are more favorable for intravital imaging of target analytes in complicated biological systems due to their minimum photodamage to samples, deep tissue penetration, and minimum interference from background autofluorescence. , Therefore, developing NIR fluorescent probes with excellent properties for intravital imaging of NAD(P)H is still quite challenging but extremely desirable.…”