2014
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.272591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myoblasts from intrauterine growth‐restricted sheep fetuses exhibit intrinsic deficiencies in proliferation that contribute to smaller semitendinosus myofibres

Abstract: Key pointsr To investigate loss of skeletal muscle mass in intrauterine growth-restricted (IUGR) fetuses near term, which may result from myoblast dysfunction, we examined semitendinosus myofibre and myoblast morphology in placental insufficiency-induced IUGR sheep fetuses; we also isolated and cultured IUGR fetal myoblasts to determine whether reduced rates of proliferation were due to intrinsic cellular defects or extrinsic factors associated with serum.r Using tests for myogenin and pax7 to identify differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
76
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
7
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These cells exhibited inappropriate proliferative phenotypes in culture versus aged matched healthy controls (Foulstone et al 2003). Recent studies collectively agree with these findings, confirming muscle derived cells do seem to remember their in vivo environment once isolated from different niches such as type II diabetes (Jiang et al 2013), obesity (Maples and Brault 2015), Please note this is an author accepted version and NOT the final version: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10522-015-9604-x intrauterine growth restriction (Yates et al 2014) and low physical activity levels (Green et al 2013;Valencia and Spangenburg 2013).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These cells exhibited inappropriate proliferative phenotypes in culture versus aged matched healthy controls (Foulstone et al 2003). Recent studies collectively agree with these findings, confirming muscle derived cells do seem to remember their in vivo environment once isolated from different niches such as type II diabetes (Jiang et al 2013), obesity (Maples and Brault 2015), Please note this is an author accepted version and NOT the final version: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10522-015-9604-x intrauterine growth restriction (Yates et al 2014) and low physical activity levels (Green et al 2013;Valencia and Spangenburg 2013).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…They collectively suggest muscle derived cells retain a memory once isolated from different environmental niches: (1) muscle derived cells from humans who are physically active, display an improved ability to uptake glucose and are somewhat protected from palmitate induced insulin resistance versus cells isolated from sedentary humans (Green et al 2013;Valencia and Spangenburg 2013); (2) muscle derived cells from obese patients do not respond to lipid oversupply with the same gene expression signatures versus control (Maples and Brault 2015); (3) muscle derived cells from intrauterine growth-restricted sheep fetuses exhibit deficiencies in proliferation versus controls (Yates et al 2014). Importantly all of these studies, highlight that muscle derived stem cells with mitotic potential could be important in the concept of programming/memory in skeletal muscle tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rapid progression through these stages of myogenesis may also contribute to the decreased MyoD and myogenin expression in muscle of offspring of obese ewes (Tong et al, 2009), impairing myogenesis during fetal development. Heat stress induced intrauterine growth restriction also resulted in decreased MyoD expression in satellite cells of the offspring after 3 days of culture (Yates et al, 2014). Together, these data demonstrate that the maternal environment has significant impacts on muscle development and satellite cell function, and importantly that in vivo treatments to the animal can alter function in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In a variety of species, maternal nutrient restriction during pregnancy limits fetal myoblast cell cycle activity, reduces myonuclei per myofiber, and reduces myofiber number in offspring (Bayol et al, 2004, Costello et al, 2008, Dwyer et al, 1995, Dwyer et al, 1992, Fahey et al, 2005, Greenwood et al, 2000, Greenwood et al, 1999, Osgerby et al, 2002, Prakash et al, 1993, Wilson et al, 1988). Though less well studied, placental insufficiency independent of maternal nutrient intake also results in decreased proliferative capacity of fetal myoblasts, as measured by decreased expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and reduced rates of replication in vitro (Yates et al, 2014). …”
Section: The Effects Of Placental Insufficiency On Fetal Skeletal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Late gestation fetal and postnatal muscle growth occurs primarily by myofiber hypertrophy (White et al, 2010). Maternal nutrient restriction in sheep, especially towards the end of gestation, reduces myofiber hypertrophy and muscle weights in the fetus (Fahey et al, 2005), as do models of placental insufficiency in guinea pigs and sheep (Bauer et al, 2003, Yates et al, 2014). The AKT-mTORC1 signaling pathway is one of the primary regulators of muscle protein synthesis in response to anabolic stimuli such as amino acids, insulin, and IGF1 in fetal lambs (Anderson et al, 2005, Brown et al, 2009, Shen et al, 2002) as well as in neonatal piglets (O'Connor et al, 2003, O'Connor et al, 2003, Suryawan et al, 2008, Suryawan et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Effects Of Placental Insufficiency On Fetal Skeletal mentioning
confidence: 99%