Finite Automata and Application to Cryptography
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78257-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual Invertibility and Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in [11,14] provide criteria and constructions that work for index sets Γ satisfying (1.7) for some neighborhood U , whereas Theorem 1.2 above requires U to be sufficiently small. We mention that even for a molecular frame for L 2 , the extension of the canonical L 2 -frame expansions to Hardy and Lebesgue spaces is non-automatic in general, and that such frames might fail to yield decompositions of L p for 1 < p < ∞, see, e.g., Tao [56] and Tchamitchian [57].…”
Section: Molecular Decompositions the Coorbit Identification Of Aniso...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in [11,14] provide criteria and constructions that work for index sets Γ satisfying (1.7) for some neighborhood U , whereas Theorem 1.2 above requires U to be sufficiently small. We mention that even for a molecular frame for L 2 , the extension of the canonical L 2 -frame expansions to Hardy and Lebesgue spaces is non-automatic in general, and that such frames might fail to yield decompositions of L p for 1 < p < ∞, see, e.g., Tao [56] and Tchamitchian [57].…”
Section: Molecular Decompositions the Coorbit Identification Of Aniso...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of spectral invariance, the theory of localized frames does not apply. For example, there are smooth and fast-decaying wavelets with several vanishing moments which yield a frame for L 2 (R), but do not admit a dual frame formed by molecules of a similar quality, and, indeed, do not lead to L p -expansions [89,90]; see also [69,Section 9.2] and [88]. For certain particular wavelet construction schemes, or for specific wavelets, such as the Mexican hat, establishing the validity of L p -expansions is significantly more challenging than that of L 2 expansions [12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N p is defined by (32), and M p is as in (30). When 1 < p < 1.04 we cannot argue directly that the Neumann series for (ST ) −1 converges, because we cannot show M p < 1 in that range.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two counterexamples reveal the subtlety of the problem. Tao [32] showed for each p ∈ (1, 2) that there exists a smooth, compactly supported synthesizer ψ that is "good" on L 2 (generating a wavelet frame there) but is "bad" on L p (having non-bijective frame operator). For p ∈ (2, ∞), Tchamitchian and Lemarié [27, pp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%