2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00041-013-9268-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelet Frame Bijectivity on Lebesgue and Hardy Spaces

Abstract: Dedicated to our friend and mentor Guido Weiss.Abstract. We prove a sufficient condition for frame-type wavelet series in L p , the Hardy space H 1 , and BMO. For example, functions in these spaces are shown to have expansions in terms of the Mexican hat wavelet, thus giving a strong answer to an old question of Meyer.Bijectivity of the wavelet frame operator acting on Hardy space is established with the help of new frequency-domain estimates on the Calderón-Zygmund constants of the frame kernel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, it is known that the frame operator associated with certain smooth and fast-decaying wavelets with several vanishing moments fails to be invertible on L p -spaces [46,Chapter 4]. In connection to this point, we mention that the Mexican hat wavelet satisfies Daubechies criterion, but the validity of the corresponding L p expansions was established only recently with significant ad-hoc work [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, it is known that the frame operator associated with certain smooth and fast-decaying wavelets with several vanishing moments fails to be invertible on L p -spaces [46,Chapter 4]. In connection to this point, we mention that the Mexican hat wavelet satisfies Daubechies criterion, but the validity of the corresponding L p expansions was established only recently with significant ad-hoc work [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Remark 5. 15 The formulation of Proposition 5.14 is rather technical, because, under those assumptions, the formula defining the frame operator might not make sense for f ∈ D(Q, L 2 , 2 w ). Indeed, the hypothesis are satisfied for every tight frame, even if…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there are smooth and fast-decaying wavelets with several vanishing moments which yield a frame for L 2 (R), but do not admit a dual frame formed by molecules of a similar quality, and, indeed, do not lead to L p -expansions [89,90]; see also [69,Section 9.2] and [88]. For certain particular wavelet construction schemes, or for specific wavelets, such as the Mexican hat, establishing the validity of L p -expansions is significantly more challenging than that of L 2 expansions [12][13][14][15]. 1.2.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus if we had explicit interpolation bounds on I − T , then we would know how close T must lie to the identity on H 1 and L 2 in order to ensure that the Neumann series for (I − T ) −1 converges on L p . Such questions arose recently in our work on wavelet frame operators [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%