Abstract:Purpose This study aimed at determining through MRI investigations, force and soreness assessments whether the modulation of muscle length is a relevant strategy for minimising neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES)-induced muscle damage in young healthy participants. Methods Comparison of 2 NMES sessions (40 isometric electrically-evoked contractions of the knee extensors) was randomly performed on 1 knee flexed at 50° (short muscle length) and the contralateral at 100° (long muscle length) in a single g… Show more
“…In addition, a long-lasting T 2 increase was reported in the VL muscle 21 d after the NMES session (10). In agreement with the minor changes in MVC force, such MRI parameters were not significantly affected when NMES was performed at short muscle lengths (28).…”
Section: Changes In Muscle Structuresupporting
confidence: 69%
“…NMES-induced muscle damage was often assessed from indirect markers, such as decreased MVC force, blood sampling parameters (e.g., creatine kinase [CK]) activity) and delayed-onset muscle soreness (10,22,23,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Functional Alterations Of Nmes-evoked Submaximal Isometric Contractions and Changes In Indirect Outcomes Of Muscle Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the transverse strain could be involved in specific damage of costameres within deep muscle fibers. This phenomenon could be further exacerbated at long muscle lengths when the passive tension in the muscle-tendon unit is increased, as illustrated by the lack of damage in stimulated muscles at short muscle lengths (28).…”
Section: The Potential Role Of Mechanical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) actually induced severe damage (10,21), whereas no or minor changes in force were reported after NMES at short muscle lengths (i.e., defined as a joint position lower than 50% RoM max ) (Fig. 1) (28). However, our understanding of the physiological and mechanical processes involved in the severe damaging effects of NMES-evoked submaximal isometric contractions remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The joint angle used during the NMES session (θ NMES ) was normalized to the RoM max as %RoM max = ((θ NMES − θ min )/RoM max  100). For instance, when θ NMES = 50°for the knee extensors (28), %RoM max = 35.7% (i.e., ((50°− 0°)/ 140°Â 100); when θ NMES = 160°for the elbow flexors (23), %RoM max = 85.7% (i.e., (160°− 40°)/140°Â 100). Experimental conditions (A-E), changes in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) force (F), evoked force during the NMES session (G), changes in CK activity (H), and the delayed-onset muscle soreness assessed from the visual analog scale (VAS) (I) were reported.…”
Understanding the physiological/mechanical mechanisms leading to skeletal muscle damage remains one of the challenges in muscle physiology. This review presents the functional, structural, and cellular consequences of electrically evoked submaximal isometric contractions that can elicit severe and localized skeletal muscle damage. Hypotheses related to underlying physiological and mechanical processes involved in severe and localized muscle damage also are discussed.
“…In addition, a long-lasting T 2 increase was reported in the VL muscle 21 d after the NMES session (10). In agreement with the minor changes in MVC force, such MRI parameters were not significantly affected when NMES was performed at short muscle lengths (28).…”
Section: Changes In Muscle Structuresupporting
confidence: 69%
“…NMES-induced muscle damage was often assessed from indirect markers, such as decreased MVC force, blood sampling parameters (e.g., creatine kinase [CK]) activity) and delayed-onset muscle soreness (10,22,23,(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Functional Alterations Of Nmes-evoked Submaximal Isometric Contractions and Changes In Indirect Outcomes Of Muscle Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the transverse strain could be involved in specific damage of costameres within deep muscle fibers. This phenomenon could be further exacerbated at long muscle lengths when the passive tension in the muscle-tendon unit is increased, as illustrated by the lack of damage in stimulated muscles at short muscle lengths (28).…”
Section: The Potential Role Of Mechanical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) actually induced severe damage (10,21), whereas no or minor changes in force were reported after NMES at short muscle lengths (i.e., defined as a joint position lower than 50% RoM max ) (Fig. 1) (28). However, our understanding of the physiological and mechanical processes involved in the severe damaging effects of NMES-evoked submaximal isometric contractions remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The joint angle used during the NMES session (θ NMES ) was normalized to the RoM max as %RoM max = ((θ NMES − θ min )/RoM max  100). For instance, when θ NMES = 50°for the knee extensors (28), %RoM max = 35.7% (i.e., ((50°− 0°)/ 140°Â 100); when θ NMES = 160°for the elbow flexors (23), %RoM max = 85.7% (i.e., (160°− 40°)/140°Â 100). Experimental conditions (A-E), changes in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC) force (F), evoked force during the NMES session (G), changes in CK activity (H), and the delayed-onset muscle soreness assessed from the visual analog scale (VAS) (I) were reported.…”
Understanding the physiological/mechanical mechanisms leading to skeletal muscle damage remains one of the challenges in muscle physiology. This review presents the functional, structural, and cellular consequences of electrically evoked submaximal isometric contractions that can elicit severe and localized skeletal muscle damage. Hypotheses related to underlying physiological and mechanical processes involved in severe and localized muscle damage also are discussed.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is often used to increase muscle strength and functionality. Muscle architecture is important for the skeletal muscle functionality. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of NMES applied at different muscle lengths on skeletal muscle architecture. Twenty‐four rats were randomly assigned to four groups (two NMES groups and two control groups). NMES was applied on the extensor digitorum longus muscle at long muscle length, which is the longest and stretched position of the muscle at 170° plantar flexion, and at medium muscle length, which is the length of the muscle at 90° plantar flexion. A control group was created for each NMES group. NMES was applied for 8 weeks, 10 min/day, 3 days/week. After 8 weeks, muscle samples were removed at the NMES intervention lengths and examined macroscopically, and microscopically using a transmission electron microscope and streo‐microscope. Muscle damage, and architectural properties of the muscle including pennation angle, fibre length, muscle length, muscle mass, physiological cross‐sectional area, fibre length/muscle length, sarcomere length, sarcomere number were then evaluated. There was an increase in fibre length and sarcomere number, and a decrease in pennation angle at both lengths. In the long muscle length group, muscle length was increased, but widespread muscle damage was observed. These results suggest that the intervention of NMES at long muscle length can increase the muscle length but also causes muscle damage. In addition, the greater longitudinal increase in muscle length may be a result of the continuous degeneration‐regeneration cycle.
ObjectiveThis study examined the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) added to the exercise or superimposed on voluntary contractions on patient‐reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsThis systematic review was described according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from a systematic literature search in five electronic databases (PubMed, PEDro, LILACS, EMBASE, and SPORTDiscus) in April 2022. We described the effects of intervention according to each PROMs (scores for Pain; Self‐reported functional ability; Symptoms (hear clicking, swelling, catching, restricted range of motion, and stiffness); Daily living function; Sports function; and Quality of life) and used a random‐effect model to examine the impact of NMES plus exercise on pain compared with exercise in people with knee OA.ResultsSix RCTs (n = 367) were included. In the qualitative synthesis, the systematic literature analysis showed improvement in pain after NMES plus exercise compared with exercise alone in three studies. The other three studies revealed no difference between groups in pain, although similar improvement after treatments. In the meta‐analysis, NMES at a specific joint angle combined with exercise was not superior to exercise alone in pain management (standardized mean difference = −0.33, 95% CI = −1.05 to 0.39, p = 0.37). There was no additional effect of NMES on exercise on self‐reported functional ability, stiffness, and physical function compared with exercise alone. In only one study, symptoms, activities of daily living, sports function, and quality of life improved after whole‐body electrostimulation combined with exercise.ConclusionThis review found insufficient evidence for the effectiveness of NMES combined with exercise in treating knee OA considering PROMs. While pain relief was observed in some studies, more high‐quality clinical trials are needed to support the use of NMES added to the exercise in clinical practice. Electrical stimulation in a whole‐body configuration combined with exercise shows promise as an alternative treatment option.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.