2020
DOI: 10.1249/jes.0000000000000239
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Skeletal Muscle Damage Produced by Electrically Evoked Muscle Contractions

Abstract: Understanding the physiological/mechanical mechanisms leading to skeletal muscle damage remains one of the challenges in muscle physiology. This review presents the functional, structural, and cellular consequences of electrically evoked submaximal isometric contractions that can elicit severe and localized skeletal muscle damage. Hypotheses related to underlying physiological and mechanical processes involved in severe and localized muscle damage also are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Acute electrically stimulated eccentric (5.5‐fold) and isometric (3.7‐fold) exercise can increase muscle collagen mRNA levels more than concentric exercise (2‐fold) in animals (Heinemeier et al ., 2007), but this is unexplored in humans. It is also unknown whether increased muscle collagen mRNA levels were triggered by the higher forces inherent to eccentric (and isometric) contractions, provoked by the contraction mode itself, or associated with the greater muscle and ECM damage after electrically stimulated versus voluntary contractions (Fouré & Gondin, 2021). Rat muscle collagens III and IV also follow this pattern of changes in mRNA levels after eccentric exercise (downhill running) (Han et al ., 1999 a ; Koskinen et al ., 2001 a ).…”
Section: Collagensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Acute electrically stimulated eccentric (5.5‐fold) and isometric (3.7‐fold) exercise can increase muscle collagen mRNA levels more than concentric exercise (2‐fold) in animals (Heinemeier et al ., 2007), but this is unexplored in humans. It is also unknown whether increased muscle collagen mRNA levels were triggered by the higher forces inherent to eccentric (and isometric) contractions, provoked by the contraction mode itself, or associated with the greater muscle and ECM damage after electrically stimulated versus voluntary contractions (Fouré & Gondin, 2021). Rat muscle collagens III and IV also follow this pattern of changes in mRNA levels after eccentric exercise (downhill running) (Han et al ., 1999 a ; Koskinen et al ., 2001 a ).…”
Section: Collagensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTGF and TGF‐β1 mRNA levels in rat gastrocnemius were higher after eccentric (TGF‐β1: 10‐fold, CTGF: 2.8‐fold) and isometric (TGF‐β1: 4‐fold, CTGF: 2.3‐fold) than concentric contractions (TGF‐β1: 2‐fold, CTGF: 1.2‐fold), with this pattern also observed for LO mRNA levels. However, it is unclear whether these changes were triggered by the higher forces inherent to eccentric (and isometric) contractions, the contraction mode, or possibly the greater muscle and ECM damage observed after electrically stimulated versus voluntary contractions (Heinemeier et al ., 2007; Fouré & Gondin, 2021). Interestingly, increases in CTGF and TGF‐β mRNA levels in VL muscle were almost identical when measured 3 h after 100 eccentric knee extensions in men, with CTGF increasing 7.6‐fold and TGF‐β2 transcripts increasing 7.8‐fold (Hyldahl et al ., 2015).…”
Section: Growth Factors Enzymes and Modulation Of Ecm Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Detailed review of sEMG intricacies is beyond the scope of this article, and interested readers are referred to the excellent review by Vigotsky et al [841]. Furthermore, it is also possible to to use the intramuscular or surface electrodes to drive muscle activity, known as electromyostimulation (EMS) [229], neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) [237], functional electrical stimulation [399], electrical muscle stimulation [220], or electrical dry needling [199].…”
Section: Muscle Activation Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%