Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on System Synthesis
DOI: 10.1109/isss.1995.520606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-process behavioral synthesis for mixed hardware-software systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A "sensitivity" determines the degree of performance improvement every time a process is allocated to a hardware processing element (PE) or a software PE. Further function/process level approaches are: Edwards et al [11] with their profile driven approach, Peng et al [12] using Petri Nets and clustering techniques, Adams et al [15] using code motions between tasks, Chou et al [16] focusing on hardware/software interface synthesis, D'Ambrosio et al [17] using a complex metric to evaluate the feasibility of a possible partition and finally applying a branch-and-bound technique, Carreras et al [18] using an approach based on the LOTOS language, the approach of Ismail et al [19] representing an interactive partitioning tool named Partif, Kalavade et al [20] using a two-phase objective function the "GCLD" approach, Sciuto et al [21] deploying a greedy algorithm that partitions Occam II applications, and Teich et al [22] an evolutionary approach. The codesign approaches [29]- [31] do not focus on automated partitioning but concentrate on the cosimulation and/or rapid prototyping issues.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A "sensitivity" determines the degree of performance improvement every time a process is allocated to a hardware processing element (PE) or a software PE. Further function/process level approaches are: Edwards et al [11] with their profile driven approach, Peng et al [12] using Petri Nets and clustering techniques, Adams et al [15] using code motions between tasks, Chou et al [16] focusing on hardware/software interface synthesis, D'Ambrosio et al [17] using a complex metric to evaluate the feasibility of a possible partition and finally applying a branch-and-bound technique, Carreras et al [18] using an approach based on the LOTOS language, the approach of Ismail et al [19] representing an interactive partitioning tool named Partif, Kalavade et al [20] using a two-phase objective function the "GCLD" approach, Sciuto et al [21] deploying a greedy algorithm that partitions Occam II applications, and Teich et al [22] an evolutionary approach. The codesign approaches [29]- [31] do not focus on automated partitioning but concentrate on the cosimulation and/or rapid prototyping issues.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%