Multiobjective Cloud Workflow Scheduling: A Multiple Populations Ant Colony System Approach

et al. 2020

IEEE Trans. Cybern.

Self Cite

Supply chain network design (SCND) is a complicated constrained optimization problem that plays a significant role in the business management. This article extends the SCND model to a large-scale SCND with uncertainties (LUSCND), which is more practical but also more challenging. However, it is difficult for traditional approaches to obtain the feasible solutions in the large-scale search space within the limited time. This article proposes a cooperative coevolutionary bare-bones particle swarm optimization (CCBBPSO) with function independent decomposition (FID), called CCBBPSO-FID, for a multiperiod three-echelon LUSCND problem. For the large-scale issue, binary encoding of the original model is converted to integer encoding for dimensionality reduction, and a novel FID is designed to efficiently decompose the problem. For obtaining the feasible solutions, two repair methods are designed to repair the infeasible solutions that appear frequently in the LUSCND problem. A step translation method is proposed to deal with the variables out of bounds, and a labeled reposition operator with adaptive probabilities is designed to repair the infeasible solutions that violate the constraints. Experiments are conducted on 405 instances with three different scales. The results show that CCBBPSO-FID has an evident superiority over contestant algorithms.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cooperative Coevolutionary Bare-Bones Particle Swarm Optimization With Function Independent Decomposition for Large-Scale Supply Chain Network Design With Uncertainties

Zhang

et al. 2020

IEEE Trans. Cybern.

Self Cite

“…Its EOP is similar to traditional EAs, which includes initialization, variation (i.e., crossover and mutation), FE, and selection. Consequently, different kinds of EAs can be adopted as the optimizer in the BDDEA-LDG, such as particle swarm optimization [63], differential evolution [64], ant colony system [65], and genetic algorithm (GA) [66].…”

Section: Whole Proposed Algorithmmentioning

confidence: 99%

Boosting Data-Driven Evolutionary Algorithm With Localized Data Generation

IEEE Trans. Evol. Computat.

Wang

et al. 2020

Self Cite

119

By efficiently building and exploiting surrogates, data-driven evolutionary algorithms (DDEAs) can be very helpful in solving expensive and computationally intensive problems. However, they still often suffer from two difficulties. First, many existing methods for building a single ad hoc surrogate are suitable for some special problems but may not work well on some other problems. Second, the optimization accuracy of DDEAs deteriorates if available data are not enough for building accurate surrogates, which is common in expensive optimization problems. To this end, this article proposes a novel DDEA with two efficient components. First, a boosting strategy (BS) is proposed for self-aware model managements, which can iteratively build and combine surrogates to obtain suitable surrogate models for different problems. Second, a localized data generation (LDG) method is proposed to generate synthetic data to alleviate data shortage and increase data quantity, which is achieved by approximating fitness through data positions. By integrating the BS and the LDG, the BDDEA-LDG algorithm is able to improve model accuracy and data quantity at the same time automatically according to the problems at hand. Besides, a tradeoff is empirically considered to strike a better balance between the effectiveness of surrogates and the time cost for building them. The experimental results show that the proposed BDDEA-LDG algorithm can generally outperform both traditional methods without surrogates and other state-of-the-art DDEA son widely used benchmarks and an arterial traffic signal timing real-world optimization problem. Furthermore, the proposed BDDEA-LDG algorithm can use only about 2% computational budgets of traditional methods for producing competitive results.

“…Different from the aforementioned approaches using only one population, we solve the MaOPs by the coevolutionary framework MPMO [12], [16]. Due to its good performance on MOPs, the MPMO is believed to be a promising method for MaOPs.…”

Section: Related Work For Maopsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coevolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization With Bottleneck Objective Learning Strategy for Many-Objective Optimization

Liu

IEEE Trans. Evol. Computat.

Gao

et al. 2019

Self Cite

213

The application of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms to many-objective optimization problems often faces challenges in terms of diversity and convergence. On the one hand, with a limited population size, it is difficult for an algorithm to cover different parts of the whole Pareto front (PF) in a large objective space. The algorithm tends to concentrate only on limited areas. On the other hand, as the number of objectives increases, solutions easily have poor values on some objectives, which can be regarded as poor bottleneck objectives that restrict solutions' convergence to the PF. Thus, we propose a coevolutionary particle swarm optimization with a bottleneck objective learning (BOL) strategy for many-objective optimization. In the proposed algorithm, multiple swarms coevolve in distributed fashion to maintain diversity for approximating different parts of the whole PF, and a novel BOL strategy is developed to improve convergence on all objectives. In addition, we develop a solution reproduction procedure with both an elitist learning strategy (ELS) and a juncture learning strategy (JLS) to improve the quality of archived solutions. The ELS helps the algorithm to jump out of local PFs, and the JLS helps to reach out to the missing areas of the PF that are easily missed by the swarms. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated using two widely used test suites with different numbers of objectives. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm compares favorably with six other state-of-the-art algorithms on many-objective optimization.