Multiagent UAV Routing: A Game Theory Analysis With Tight Price of Anarchy Bounds

Abstract

We study the multiagent unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) routing problem where a set of UAVs needs to collect information via surveillance of an area of operation. Each UAV is autonomous and does not rely on a reliable communication medium to coordinate with other UAVs. We formulate the problem as a game where UAVs are players and their strategies are the different routes they can take. Our model also incorporates the useful concept of information fusion. This results in a new variant of weighted congestion-type games. We show that the price of anarchy (PoA) of the game is at most 2, irrespective of the number of UAVs and their sensor capabilities. This also validates the empirical results of earlier works. Furthermore, we identify classes of games for the existence of a pure Nash equilibrium. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first such theoretical results in the related literature. Finally, we conduct experimental studies using randomly generated instances with several multiagent UAV routing policies. Our insights are that PoA increases with the congestion level when the same number of UAVs search a smaller area or more UAVs search the same area, and on an average, our proposed policies are less than 10% worse than the centralized optimal for the problem scenarios attempted.Note to Practitioners-UAVs are becoming increasingly popular for information collection tasks in defense and civilian applications alike. When the collection area is large, it is not unusual that a fleet of UAVs is deployed. Routing of a fleet can be performed in a centralized or decentralized manner. Decentralized routing might be the only possibility when centralized situational awareness is not possible due to bandwidth limitations and centralized optimal routes for each UAV in the fleet are too complex to compute. Autonomous solutions have several other advantages, let alone simplicity. For managers of UAV systems, our work provides the first theoretical characterization of how bad could decentralized routing be. Under various scenarios of information fusion, specifically weak and strong, and the attribution of information collected to each UAV of a team, we prove that the

Towards 6G wireless communication networks: vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts

“…In UAV group networks [260,261], the mobility and altitude of UAVs, transmitted power, inter-UAV distances, extraneous noise, uneven UAV access users' traffic distribution in both spatial and temporal domains, will largely affect the routing protocol [262] and conventional routing protocols fail to work. Several novel routing algorithms have been proposed recently for UAV group networks to achieve better performance [263][264][265][266][267][268]. Nevertheless, routing strategies which can adapt to high mobility, dynamic topology, and different routing capabilities in LEO satellite networks and UAV group networks are still in their early stage and need further studies.…”

A Hybrid Large Neighborhood Search Algorithm for Solving the Multi Depot UAV Swarm Routing Problem

“…Then, the depot 1 is selected randomly and a minimum spanning tree is obtained. There are two paths which start form the depot in the minimum spanning tree: [1,5,8,4,7,6,9], [1,2,3]. The first path is selected due to it contains most task points at Step 1.…”

“…Furthermore, a mathematical programming was proposed to establish a real-time adaptive routing system. Thakoor et al [7] addressed the multi UAV routing problem where a set of UAVs need to collect information via surveillance of an area. Apart from route planning another important consideration is to optimize the scheduling in a drone-based delivery system.…”

UAV Swarm Intelligence: Recent Advances and Future Trends

“…For the autonomous routing problem of formation drones flying in areas where communication is refused, this area does not allow the exchange of information between drones. Modeling the problem under the framework of game theory, the drone can choose multiple strategies to take the next step [57]. [58] proposes a muti-UAV Bio-Inspired Optmizaed Leader Election (BOLE) method, the selected leader acts as a decision maker and assigns taks to other drones.…”