2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2013.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective list scheduling of workflow applications in distributed computing infrastructures

Abstract: Executing large-scale applications in distributed computing infrastructures (DCI), for example modern Cloud environments, involves optimisation of several conflicting objectives such as makespan, reliability, energy, or economic cost. Despite this trend, scheduling in heterogeneous DCIs has been traditionally approached as a single or bi-criteria optimisation problem. In this paper, we propose a generic multi-objective optimization framework supported by a list scheduling heuristic for scientific workflows in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Fard et al [14] study the effectiveness of list scheduling in scientific workflow applications and propose a multi-objective list scheduling (MOLS) for scheduling scientific workflow applications in distributed computing infrastructures (DCIs). Instead of concentrating only on improving the makespan of the workflow application, their proposed approach aims to improve execution cost, energy consumption, makespan and reliability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fard et al [14] study the effectiveness of list scheduling in scientific workflow applications and propose a multi-objective list scheduling (MOLS) for scheduling scientific workflow applications in distributed computing infrastructures (DCIs). Instead of concentrating only on improving the makespan of the workflow application, their proposed approach aims to improve execution cost, energy consumption, makespan and reliability.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the objective function i.e Q is defined as (16). Here, 0 ≤ v(G; M) ≤ 1 is the aggregated violation of deadline and budget as computed by (17). In this formula, max {|t L B (G) − t max | , |t U B (G) − t max |} illustrate the maximum possible distance between makespan and deadline and is used for normalization.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies have been done in the area of constrained workflow scheduling [13][14][15][16][17]. In this problem, the goal is to find scheduling such that the execution of workflow is completed within the user defined deadline and/or the cost of execution be within the predefined budget.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much work on the workflow scheduling problem in heterogeneous computing environments [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. Heterogeneous Earliest-Finish-Time (HEFT) and Critical-Pathon-a-Processor (CPOP) [23] are two best-known listbased heuristics addressing the performance-effective workflow scheduling problem, which are widely used in popular workflow management tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%