Abstract-The ultimate goal of cloud providers by providing resources is increasing their revenues. This goal leads to a selfish behavior that negatively affects the users of a commercial multicloud environment. In this paper, we introduce a pricing model and a truthful mechanism for scheduling single tasks considering two objectives: monetary cost and completion time. With respect to the social cost of the mechanism, i.e., minimizing the completion time and monetary cost, we extend the mechanism for dynamic scheduling of scientific workflows. We theoretically analyze the truthfulness and the efficiency of the mechanism and present extensive experimental results showing significant impact of the selfish behavior of the cloud providers on the efficiency of the whole system. The experiments conducted using real-world and synthetic workflow applications demonstrate that our solutions dominate in most cases the Pareto-optimal solutions estimated by two classical multiobjective evolutionary algorithms.
Economy models have long been considered as a promising complement to the classical distributed resource management not only due of their dynamic and decentralized nature, but also because the concept of financial valuation of resources and services is an inherent part of any such model. In its broadest sense, scheduling of scientific applications in distributed Grid and Cloud environments can be regarded as a market-based negotiation between a scheduling service optimizing user-centric objectives (execution time, budget), and a resource manager optimizing provider-centric metrics (resource utilization, income, job throughput). In this paper, we propose a new instantiation of the negotiation protocol between the scheduler and resource manager using a market-based Continuous Double Auction (CDA) model. We analyze different scheduling strategies that can be applied and identify general strategic patterns that can lead to a fast and cheap work ow execution. In the experimental study, we demonstrate that under certain circumstances one can benefit by applying an aggressive scheduling strategy.
Executing large-scale applications in distributed computing infrastructures (DCI), for example modern Cloud environments, involves optimisation of several conflicting objectives such as makespan, reliability, energy, or economic cost. Despite this trend, scheduling in heterogeneous DCIs has been traditionally approached as a single or bi-criteria optimisation problem. In this paper, we propose a generic multi-objective optimization framework supported by a list scheduling heuristic for scientific workflows in heterogeneous DCIs. The algorithm approximates the optimal solution by considering user-specified constraints on objectives in a dual strategy: maximizing the distance to the user's constraints for dominant solutions and minimizing it otherwise. We instantiate the framework and algorithm for a four-objective case study comprising makespan, economic cost, energy consumption, and reliability as optimisation goals. We implemented our method as part of the ASKALON environment [1] for Grid and Cloud computing and demonstrate through extensive real and synthetic simulation experiments that our algorithm outperforms related bi-criteria heuristics while meeting the user constraints most of the time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.