2017
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2017.2680462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-Objective Bilevel Coordinated Planning of Distributed Generation and Distribution Network Frame Based on Multiscenario Technique Considering Timing Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the schematic of the modified IEEE 33‐node distribution system, where the centralized access of DGs (mainly for synchronous DGs with considerable fault current contributions) is applied. The rated voltage of the system is 12.66 kV, and the total load is 3715 kW + j2300 kVar . The capacity of the IIDG is same as that of the synchronous DG, and it is uniformly set as 500 kVA.…”
Section: Performance Verification Of the Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows the schematic of the modified IEEE 33‐node distribution system, where the centralized access of DGs (mainly for synchronous DGs with considerable fault current contributions) is applied. The rated voltage of the system is 12.66 kV, and the total load is 3715 kW + j2300 kVar . The capacity of the IIDG is same as that of the synchronous DG, and it is uniformly set as 500 kVA.…”
Section: Performance Verification Of the Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…wind and solar power generations, load growth, asset availability, future capital costs, etc. The models and solution methodologies developed to address uncertainties can be classified into the following broad categories: a) Monte Carlo simulation nested within a single-or multi-objective optimization model [53][54][55][56][57][58]; b) Probabilistic-stochastic models incorporated into optimization routines [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]; c) Stochastic programming models [68][69]; and d) "Scenario-like" models integrated within optimization models [70][71][72][73][74]. The most important drawbacks are: a) Distribution planning in utilities is always based on deterministic criteria and there is no simple way to link them with the probabilistic results; b) Results interpretation can be very difficult as well as subsequent decision making using these results; and c) Large amount of data may be required.…”
Section: Probabilistic Decision Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two downsides are the biggest obstacle in applying any such method in real-life, because design engineers would never propose a solution they don't understand and/or is not compliant with the planning standards. In that context, the last group of methods [70][71][72][73][74] is best suited for real-life planning; however, all methods produce amalgamated solutions for all considered scenarios in the horizon year. This can be deemed as an advantage in the academic world because the global optimum is obtained; however, in real-life, each investment decision needs to be clearly justified to the Regulator and amalgamated solutions are not welcome.…”
Section: Probabilistic Decision Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective function of [10] aims to minimize distributed generation (DG) installation cost and network losses. In [11], a DG planning scheme is proposed to minimize the network upgrade cost, network loss cost, power interruption cost, and users' power supply cost. A compromised scheme is obtained in the non-inferior solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%