2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-level predictive maintenance for multi-component systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A graph can be used for modeling functional and structural knowledge, where the nodes represent entities and the directed but unweighted arcs are either belonging relations (i.e., a component or a sub-function to a function) or a causal relationship (i.e., the failure of the upstream entity makes the downstream entity inoperative) [6]. In reliability diagrams [21,22], three types of entities are considered corresponding to frames: the components, entities in serial structures that implement what we call simple functions and entities in parallel structures that implement redundancies.…”
Section: Behavioral Knowledge Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graph can be used for modeling functional and structural knowledge, where the nodes represent entities and the directed but unweighted arcs are either belonging relations (i.e., a component or a sub-function to a function) or a causal relationship (i.e., the failure of the upstream entity makes the downstream entity inoperative) [6]. In reliability diagrams [21,22], three types of entities are considered corresponding to frames: the components, entities in serial structures that implement what we call simple functions and entities in parallel structures that implement redundancies.…”
Section: Behavioral Knowledge Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Nguyen, Do, & Grall 2015) presents a multi-level preventive maintenance decision making algorithm. At each inspection time, conditional probabilities are calculated to update the system-level reliability modelled with Reliability Block Diagrams (RBD).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysed parameters include inspection, renewal, and repair times and maintenance threshold. All the analysed system-level models take into account the combinatorial failure logic of the system (Nguyen, Do, & Grall 2015, Do, Vu, Barros, & Bérenguer 2015, Vu, Do, & Barros 2016. Besides, most of the reviewed approaches integrate a degradation process to model the degradation of the asset and facilitate the posterior analytical treatment (Grall, Bérenguer, & Dieulle 2002, Haddad, Sandborn, & Pecht 2012, Do, Vu, Barros, & Bérenguer 2015, Do, Voisin, Levrat, & Iung 2015.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural health monitoring, together with advanced signal processing methods provide current status of the pipes [2]. This information leads the identification and diagnosis of the fault in ap ipe and its location [3,4], and thus, strategies can be set for predictive maintenance [5,6,7,8]. In addition, these techniques can be controlled remotely,reducing the maintenance costs, downtimes, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%