Multi-criteria evaluation of on-board hydrogen storage technologies using the MACBETH approach

Montignac, Florent; Noirot, Isabelle; Chaudourne, S.

doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.098

Cited by 52 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The energy storage system is one of the main parts of “energy planning/selection” and “energy management building” study fields, and it has been tackled by the help of many MCDM approaches. For instance, Montignac et al have utilized MACBETH technique to choose the most suitable hydrogen storage method among three options: compressed gas (type IV 70 MPa), cryogenic liquid, and solid phase. The proposed model has been validated through a real case study conducted for a 6 kg of hydrogen fuel cell vehicle .…”

Section: Energy Storage Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A novel multicriteria sustainability investigation of energy storage systems

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Affordable, clean, efficient, flexible, and reliable energy storage is an important component of sustainable energy systems. There are several studies in the literature concentrating on improving the sustainability performance of energy storage systems from economic and technical perspectives. However, a comprehensive performance investigation of energy storage systems that take economic, environmental, social, and technical criteria into account is still needed. For that reason, in the present study, it is aimed to perform a complete assessment and analysis of the sustainability of energy storage systems for residential applications in communities and cities. Pumped hydro, conventional batteries, high‐temperature batteries, flow batteries, and hydrogen are the selected energy storage systems. In order to handle the vagueness and ambiguity during the assessment and to eliminate the perceived hesitancy in the decision makers' preferences, an innovative method, a hybrid hesitant fuzzy multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) methodology composed of hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (HFAHP) and hesitant fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (HFTOPSIS), is utilized to assess the sustainability of the selected systems. In this study, four different performance criteria: economic (power cost and energy cost), environmental (pollutant emissions, area requirement, wastewater quality, and solid waste production), social (safety, accessibility, ease of use, and public acceptance), and technical (efficiency, storage capacity, cycling limit, and performance degradation) are taken into consideration. The performance evaluation results indicate that technical performance has the highest influence and social performance has the lowest influence when evaluating the sustainability of the selected energy storage systems. And hydrogen has the highest sustainability performance compared with the other selected energy storage options.

show abstract

Section: Energy Storage Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A novel multicriteria sustainability investigation of energy storage systems

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Roubens et al (2006) quantify the attractiveness and repulsiveness of possible governments to parties. Montignac et al (2009) Rodrigues (2014) uses it, together with a modified Delphi technique, to evaluate population health at the municipality level in Portugal over twenty years. Viglioni et al (2016) propose a performance evaluation model for project management office.…”

Section: Macbeth Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…MACBETH uses only qualitative judgements of difference in attractiveness which allow value functions, value scores for alternatives and weights for criteria to be constructed (Bana e Costa et al, 2008). Additionally, MACBETH seems particularly suited to the aggregation of assessment criteria when absolute and relative information is required; this allows alternatives to be assessed considering specific targets (Montignac et al, 2009). It is also an interactive technique because it requires the decision makers to think about, communicate and discuss their judgements and preferences with the rest of the decision group.…”

Section: Macbeth Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maintenance strategy selection in electric power distribution systems

Carnero

Gómez

2017

Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…14, 42 -44. MACBETH has been used in various fields such as individual's career choice 45 , evaluation and comparison of the technical performance of onboard hydrogen storage technologies 46 , politics 47 , supply chain management 48 , earthquake risk mitigation 49 .…”

Section: Macbethmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multiple Criteria Human Performance Evaluation Using Choquet Integral

Gürbüz¹

2010

IJCIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is a critical issue for the continuity of an organization to efficiently evaluate the performance of its employees. The evaluation process has to guarantee a sufficient level of objectivity and a limited level of subjectivity in order to answer the employees' expectancies. In this study, a multi-criteria approach to this problem has been proposed since the employees' performance depends on various criteria simultaneously. It is also considered that those criteria may have interaction. Hence, Choquet Integral has been used to handle this situation. To illustrate the use of the proposed method, the performance of a set of employees working in a company in medical sector is evaluated.

show abstract

Multi-criteria evaluation of on-board hydrogen storage technologies using the MACBETH approach

Cited by 52 publications

References 11 publications

A novel multicriteria sustainability investigation of energy storage systems

A novel multicriteria sustainability investigation of energy storage systems

Maintenance strategy selection in electric power distribution systems

Multiple Criteria Human Performance Evaluation Using Choquet Integral

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About