SUMMARYFarmer field schools (FFSs) were conducted in southern India to reduce pesticide input and enhance sustainability of cotton production systems. This study was carried out to determine the additional benefits of FFSs in the social and economic arena, using the sustainable livelihoods (SL) concept to frame the evaluation. Farmers who had participated in the integrated pest management (IPM) FFSs perceived a range of impacts much beyond the adoption of IPM practices. The reduced cost of cultivation allowed for financial recovery from debt and the building of physical assets. IPMFFS households and production systems were perceived by the participants to have become more economically resilient than Non-IPMFFS control groups when faced with adversity. In the participants' view, IPMFFSs also led to enhanced individual and community social well-being, a benefit valued in particular by the women participants. The study tested a new application of the SL conceptual framework as a tool for evaluation.
I N T RO D U C T I O NFarmer field schools (FFSs) provide people-centred learning experiences that promote the empowerment of farmers through education. Weekly training sessions are conducted in the villages for a group of 25-30 farmers by expert facilitators during the cropping season. Unlike most previous integrated pest management (IPM) training held in the country, in FFSs the curriculum is developed in collaboration with farmers to address their most relevant agro-ecological problems with locale-specific solutions. FFSs were first applied on a wide scale in 1989 in Indonesia in order to reduce reliance on pesticides in rice by enhancing farmers' understanding of crop ecology (Kenmore, 1996). In India, FFSs have been organized for a number of crops, and especially with the aim of reducing the massive use of pesticides in cotton production. The training curriculum has engaged researchers, extension agents and farmers in on-site participatory research to compare IPM options with the farmer practices currently in use. IPM management decisions are based on the results of an agro-ecosystem analysis of field observations and measurements carried out by the farmers. The critical