2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2018.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI detection of radiographically occult fractures of the hip and pelvis in the elderly: Comparison of T2-weighted Dixon sequence with T1-weighted and STIR sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the case of metastases, the T2-weighted Dixon sequence might be an appropriate alternative to the standard protocol (combination of T1-weighted and fatsuppressed fluid-sensitive sequences) to search for spinal focal MM lesions. Nevertheless, Heynen et al showed that T2-weighted Dixon fat-only images had no significantly different interobserver agreement but were less sensitive than T1-weighted images for the detection of hip and pelvic occult fractures [17]. Due to this specific interest of T1-weighted images, it seems premature to take the opportunity to shorten imaging time by removing the T1weighted sequence from the protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of metastases, the T2-weighted Dixon sequence might be an appropriate alternative to the standard protocol (combination of T1-weighted and fatsuppressed fluid-sensitive sequences) to search for spinal focal MM lesions. Nevertheless, Heynen et al showed that T2-weighted Dixon fat-only images had no significantly different interobserver agreement but were less sensitive than T1-weighted images for the detection of hip and pelvic occult fractures [17]. Due to this specific interest of T1-weighted images, it seems premature to take the opportunity to shorten imaging time by removing the T1weighted sequence from the protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the assessment of the fracture age, STIR- and T1-weighted sequences are usually acquired to identify edema-equivalent bone marrow changes, which are considered to be highly specific for bone marrow edema after an acute trauma [ 12 , 13 ]. Recent studies also suggested the use of a T2-weighted Dixon sequence for the detection of occult fractures and the differentiation of malignant versus benign vertebral fractures in order to shorten the examination duration [ 14 , 15 ]. Nevertheless, accurate examination of the spine with regular morphological sequences or with a combination of the sequences mentioned previously would take at least 10 to 15 min and require several MR sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STIR has until now been the most frequently used water-sensitive sequence in whole-body MRI-protocols [1] but has shown similar performance for T2W Dixon compared to STIR in the assessment of the bone marrow [68]. Any differences between sequences are more likely dependent on general technical parameters, hardware, software, and differences in patient handling.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%