Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease with a high prevalence worldwide, characterized by low bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration, predisposing an individual to fragility fractures. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the clinical reference standard for diagnosing osteoporosis and for assessing fracture risk for decades. However, other imaging modalities are of increasing importance to investigate the etiology, treatment, and fracture risk. The purpose of this work is to review the available literature on quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods and related findings in osteoporosis at the spine and proximal femur as the clinically most important fracture sites. Trabecular bone microstructure analysis at the proximal femur based on high-resolution MRI allows for a better prediction of osteoporotic fracture risk than DXA-based bone mineral density (BMD) alone. In the 1990s, T 2 * mapping was shown to correlate with the density and orientation of the trabecular bone. Recently, quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), which overcomes some of the limitations of T 2 * mapping, has been applied for trabecular bone quantifications at the spine, whereas ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging provides valuable surrogate markers of cortical bone quantity and quality. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI (CSE-MRI) enable the quantitative assessment of the nonmineralized bone compartment through extraction of the bone marrow fat fraction (BMFF). Furthermore, CSE-MRI allows for the differentiation of osteoporotic vs. pathologic fractures, which is of high clinical relevance. Lastly, advanced postprocessing and image analysis tools, particularly considering statistical parametric mapping and region-specific BMFF distributions, have high potential to further improve MRI-based fracture risk assessments at the spine and hip. Level of Evidence: 5 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2

Objectives To evaluate the performance of 3D T1w spoiled gradient-echo (T1SGRE) and ultra-short echo time (UTE) MRI sequences for the detection and assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes compared with conventional CT. Methods Fractures (n = 44) and degenerative changes (n = 60 spinal segments) were evaluated in 30 patients (65 ± 14 years, 18 women) on CT and 3-T MRI, including CT-like images derived from T1SGRE and UTE. Two radiologists evaluated morphological features on both modalities: Genant and AO/Magerl classifications, anterior/posterior vertebral height, fracture age; disc height, neuroforaminal diameter, grades of spondylolisthesis, osteophytes, sclerosis, and facet joint degeneration. Diagnostic accuracy and agreement between MRI and CT and between radiologists were assessed using crosstabs, weighted κ, and intraclass correlation coefficients. Image quality was graded on a Likert scale. Results For fracture detection, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.95, 0.98, and 0.97 for T1SGRE and 0.91, 0.96, and 0.95 for UTE. Agreement between T1SGRE and CT was substantial to excellent (e.g., Genant: κ, 0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.00]; AO/Magerl: κ, 0.90 [0.76–1.00]; osteophytes: κ, 0.91 [0.82–1.00]; sclerosis: κ, 0.68 [0.48–0.88]; spondylolisthesis: ICCs, 0.99 [0.99–1.00]). Agreement between UTE and CT was lower, ranging from moderate (e.g., sclerosis: κ, 0.43 [0.26–0.60]) to excellent (spondylolisthesis: ICC, 0.99 [0.99–1.00]). Inter-reader agreement was substantial to excellent (0.52–1.00), respectively, for all parameters. Median image quality of T1SGRE was rated significantly higher than that of UTE (p < 0.001). Conclusions Morphologic assessment of bone pathologies of the spine using MRI was feasible and comparable to CT, with T1SGRE being more robust than UTE. Key Points • Vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes can be assessed on CT-like MR images, with 3D T1w spoiled gradient-echo–based images showing a high diagnostic accuracy and agreement with CT. • This could enable MRI to precisely assess bone morphology, and 3D T1SGRE MRI sequences may substitute additional spinal CT examinations in the future. • Image quality and robustness of T1SGRE sequences are higher than those of UTE MRI for the assessment of bone structures.

The bone marrow proton density fat fraction (PDFF) assessed with MRI enables the differentiation between osteoporotic/osteopenic patients with and without vertebral fractures. Therefore, PDFF may be a potentially useful biomarker for bone fragility assessment. Introduction To evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based proton density fat fraction (PDFF) of vertebral bone marrow can differentiate between osteoporotic/osteopenic patients with and without vertebral fractures. Methods Of the 52 study patients, 32 presented with vertebral fractures of the lumbar spine (66.4 ± 14.4 years, 62.5% women; acute low-energy osteoporotic/osteopenic vertebral fractures, N = 25; acute high-energy traumatic vertebral fractures, N = 7). These patients were frequency matched for age and sex to patients without vertebral fractures (N = 20, 69.3 ± 10.1 years, 70.0% women). Trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) values were derived from quantitative computed tomography. Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat MRI of the lumbar spine was performed, and PDFF maps were calculated. Associations between fracture status and PDFF were assessed using multivariable linear regression models. Results Over all patients, mean PDFF and trabecular BMD correlated significantly (r = − 0.51, P < 0.001). In the osteoporotic/osteopenic group, those patients with osteoporotic/osteopenic fractures had a significantly higher PDFF than those without osteoporotic fractures after adjusting for age, sex, weight, height, and trabecular BMD (adjusted mean difference [95% confidence interval], 20.8% [10.4%, 30.7%]; P < 0.001), although trabecular BMD values showed no significant difference between the subgroups (P = 0.63). For the differentiation of patients with and without vertebral fractures in the osteoporotic/osteopenic subgroup using mean PDFF, an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.88 (P = 0.006) was assessed. When evaluating all patients with vertebral fractures, those with high-energy traumatic fractures had a significantly lower PDFF than those with low-energy osteoporotic/osteopenic vertebral fractures (P < 0.001). Conclusion MR-based PDFF enables the differentiation between osteoporotic/osteopenic patients with and without vertebral fractures, suggesting the use of PDFF as a potential biomarker for bone fragility. Keywords bone marrow • magnetic resonance imaging • osteoporosis • spine Abbreviations PDFFProton density fat fraction BME Bone marrow edema BMD Bone mineral density DXA Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry Key findings• PDFF allows the differentiation between osteoporotic/ osteopenic patients with and without vertebral fractures.• PDFF may be a useful tool for fragility assessment in addition to the BMD.

No abstract

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Background: Chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation techniques have been used for fat quantification [proton density fat fraction (PDFF)], but they also enable the assessment of bone marrow T2*, which has previously been reported to be a potential biomarker for osteoporosis and may give insight into the cause of vertebral fractures (i.e., osteoporotic vs. traumatic) and the microstructure of the bone when applied to vertebral bone marrow. Methods:The 32 patients (78.1% with low-energy osteopenic/osteoporotic fractures, mean age 72.3±9.8 years, 76% women; 21.9% with high-energy traumatic fractures, 47.3±12.8 years, no women) were frequency-matched for age and sex to subjects without vertebral fractures (n=20). All study patients underwent 3T-MRI of the lumbar spine including sagittally acquired spoiled gradient echo sequences for chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation, from which T2* values were obtained. Volumetric trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone parameters describing the three-dimensional structural integrity of trabecular bone were derived from quantitative CT. Associations between T2* measurements, fracture status and trabecular bone parameters were assessed using multivariable linear regression models.Results: Mean T2* values of non fractured vertebrae in all patients showed a significant correlation with BMD (r=−0.65, P<0.001), trabecular number (TbN) (r=−0.56, P<0.001) and trabecular spacing (TbSp) (r=0.61, P<0.001); patients with low-energy osteoporotic vertebral fractures showed significantly higher mean T2* values than those with traumatic fractures (13.6±4.3 vs. 8.4±2.2 ms, P=0.01) as well as a significantly lower TbN (0.69±0.08 vs. 0.93±0.03 mm−1, P<0.01) and a significantly larger trabecular spacing (1.06±0.16 vs. 0.56±0.08 mm, P<0.01). Mean T2* values of osteoporotic patients with and without vertebral fracture showed no significant difference (13.5±3.4 vs. 15.6±3.5 ms, P=0.40). When comparing the mean T2* of the fractured vertebrae, no significant difference could be detected between low-energy osteoporotic fractures and high-energy traumatic fractures (12.6±5.4 vs. 8.1±2.4 ms, P=0.10).Conclusions: T2* mapping of vertebral bone marrow using using chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation allows for assessing osteoporosis as well as the trabecular microstructure and enables a radiation-

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic value of CT-like images based on a 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo-based sequence (T1SGRE) for the visualization of the pediatric skull and the identification of pathologies, such as craniosynostosis or fractures. Methods In this prospective study, 20 patients with suspected craniosynostosis (mean age 1.26 ± 1.38 years, 10 females) underwent MR imaging including the T1SGRE sequence and 2 more patients were included who presented with skull fractures (0.5 and 6.3 years, both male). Additionally, the skull of all patients was assessed using radiography or CT in combination with ultrasound. Two radiologists, blinded to the clinical information, evaluated the CT-like images. The results were compared to the diagnosis derived from the other imaging modalities and intraoperative findings. Intrarater and interrater agreement was calculated using Cohen’s κ. Results Of the 22 patients 8 had a metopic, 4 a coronal and 2 a sagittal craniosynostosis and 2 patients showed a complex combination of craniosynostoses. The agreement between the diagnosis based on the T1SGRE and the final diagnosis was substantial (Cohen’s κ = 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77–1.00 for radiologist 1 and κ = 0.76, CI 0.51–1.00 for radiologist 2). Of the patients with fractures, one presented with a ping pong fracture and one with a fracture of the temporal bone. Both radiologists could identify the fractures using the T1SGRE. Conclusion The visualization of the pediatric skull and the assessment of sutures using a CT-like T1SGRE MR-sequence is feasible and comparable to other imaging modalities, and thus may help to reduce radiation exposure in pediatric patients. The technique may also be a promising imaging tool for other pathologies, such as fractures.

Objectives To evaluate the performance of single-echo Dixon water-fat imaging and computed tomography (CT)–like imaging based on a single ultrashort echo time (sUTE) MR sequence for imaging of vertebral fractures as well as degenerative bone changes of the spine in comparison to conventional CT and MR sequences. Methods Thirty patients with suspected acute vertebral fractures were examined using a 3-T MRI, including an sUTE sequence as well as short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted sequences. During postprocessing, water-fat separation was performed by solving the smoothness-constrained inverse water-fat problem based on a single-complex UTE image. By removing the unwanted low-frequency phase terms, additional MR-based susceptibility-weighted-like (SW-like) images with CT-like contrast were created. Two radiologists evaluated semi-quantitative and quantitative features of fractures and degenerative changes independently and separately on CT and MR images. Results In total, all 58 fractures were accurately detected of whom 24 were correctly classified as acute fractures with an edema detected on the water-fat-separated UTE images, using STIR and T1w sequences as standard of reference. For the morphological assessment of fractures and degenerative changes, the overall agreement between SW-like images and CT was substantial to excellent (e.g., Genant: κ 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.54–1.00); AO/Magerl: κ 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.43–1.00)). Overall inter-reader agreement for water-fat-separated UTE images and SW-like images was substantial to almost perfect. Conclusion Detection and assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine were feasible and accurate using water-fat-separated images as well as SW-like images, both derived from the same sUTE-Dixon sequence. Key Points • The detection of acute vertebral fractures was feasible using water-fat-separated images and CT-like images reconstructed from one sUTE sequence. • Assessment of the vertebral fractures using SW-like images with CT-like contrast was found to be comparable to conventional CT. • sUTE imaging of the spine can help reduce examination times and radiation exposure.