2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-004-0828-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRI assessment of knee osteoarthritis: Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System (KOSS)?inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility of a compartment-based scoring system

Abstract: The presented comprehensive MR scoring system for osteoarthritic changes of the knee has a good to very good inter-observer and intra-observer reproducibility. Thus the score form with its definitions can be used for standardized assessment of osteoarthritic changes to monitor medical therapy in research studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
167
1
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
167
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The same classification system has recently been successfully applied to images acquired with a 1.0 T peripheral MR imaging system and a time-efficient sequence protocol has been proposed for this purpose that was compared with an established reference protocol with longer acquisition time (33). Another compartment-based scoring system, termed knee osteoarthritis scoring system (KOSS), has also been published, with intra-observer reproducibility of 0.76-0.96 (ICC) and inter-observer reproducibility amongst two independent observers of 0.63-0.915 (56). Some limitations of these scoring systems have been characterized by Conaghan et al (57), who applied the WORMS grading systems to knees of 336 subjects (three readers) and compared these with a Rasch measurement model.…”
Section: Image Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same classification system has recently been successfully applied to images acquired with a 1.0 T peripheral MR imaging system and a time-efficient sequence protocol has been proposed for this purpose that was compared with an established reference protocol with longer acquisition time (33). Another compartment-based scoring system, termed knee osteoarthritis scoring system (KOSS), has also been published, with intra-observer reproducibility of 0.76-0.96 (ICC) and inter-observer reproducibility amongst two independent observers of 0.63-0.915 (56). Some limitations of these scoring systems have been characterized by Conaghan et al (57), who applied the WORMS grading systems to knees of 336 subjects (three readers) and compared these with a Rasch measurement model.…”
Section: Image Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that these changes play a major role in this disease, semi-quantitative scoring systems [9][10][11][12][13] are generally used because a reliable quantification method is lacking. There have been very few technologies developed aimed at the quantification of BMLs using solely MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, scoring of BMLs in MRI systematically appears in the various osteoarthritis knee evaluation systems contributing to the final grade of an overall knee condition [9][10][11][12][13] commonly used in longitudinal studies. In parallel, the combination of MRI and image processing techniques has allowed several semiautomatic and automatic systems to be developed for articular tissue segmentation including bone [14][15][16][17][18] , cartilage [19][20][21][22][23] , menisci [24] , and synovitis [25] for quantitative and semi-quantitative evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Klinik pratikte, dizde kıkırdak lezyonları sıklıkla modifiye Noyes, Outerbridge skalasıy-la ya da ICRS (International Cartilage Repair Society) sınıflandırmasıyla derecelendirilir [10]. Klinik araştırmalarda özellikle diz osteoartrit çalışmalarında MR görüntüleme ile kıkır-dağın morfolojik değerlendirmesinde; WOR-MS (Whole-Organ MR Imaging Score) [11] BLOKS (Boston-Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score) [12] ve KOSS (Knee Osteoarthritis Scoring System) [13] gibi yarı kantitatif skorlama sistemleri kullanılmaktadır. Bu skorlama sistemlerinde, eklem kıkırdağının morfolojik özellikleri, diz etrafındaki diğer yapılar (örn; menisküsler, subkondral kemik, osteofitler ve sinovyum) ile birlikte değerlendirilir.…”
Section: Kıkırdak Lezyonlarının Tarif Edilmesiunclassified