2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement behaviours of potamodromous fish within a large anthropised river after the reestablishment of the longitudinal connectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
46
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…River fragmentation due to the presence of anthropogenic structures (e.g., dams or weirs) has been identified as one of the main causes of the decline of many fish species [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. There are currently about 7000 large dams in Europe [8], and more than 1400 in the Iberian Peninsula alone (1200 in Spain and 256 in Portugal) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River fragmentation due to the presence of anthropogenic structures (e.g., dams or weirs) has been identified as one of the main causes of the decline of many fish species [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. There are currently about 7000 large dams in Europe [8], and more than 1400 in the Iberian Peninsula alone (1200 in Spain and 256 in Portugal) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant differences were found in daily patterns of fish passage ascending the fish lift, which is in accordance with our expectations. Though some studies suggest that cyprinids are more active during the night to avoid predation (e.g., [37,41]), such patterns can be quite species-specific [16]. In a recent study conducted in the Meuse river basin (Belgium), Benitez et al [16] found that the common barbel Barbus barbus did not show any differences in daily activity when passing through the existing fishways, contrarily to the trout, which was more active during the day, a result that was also supported by some authors (e.g., [43]), but not others (e.g., [42]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predict that (i) fish counts through the lift would vary between the different months for all three species following patterns outlined in the literature, i.e., cyprinid species movements should mainly occur during the reproductive season, i.e., summer [40,41], and further extending to early fall when species start to search for winter, feeding or thermal refuges [15,42] (with regard to the trout, movements are predicted as well to occur in the reproductive season, in this case, between late fall and early-winter [43]); (ii) daily activity of the studied species would not show marked diurnal/nocturnal preferences due to the absence of natural predators in the River Lima [16,44], which should not restrict movements to take place preferentially during the night, when survival is expected to be maximum [26]; (iii) water temperature and flow, two of the most important environmental factors responsible for triggering migration [35,45], would be the most significant ones for the target species; (iv) large-sized and faster-flowing species would be better able to cope with higher peak-flow magnitudes (50 and 100 m 3 s −1 ) than smaller ones, and hence expected to use the lift during such conditions; and (v) selectivity should be low, although the presence of larger individuals in the lift when compared to the downstream river segment, would be expected to occur as a result of upstream migration of adults to spawning sites [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations