Motivators and Demotivators of Agile Software Development: Elicitation and Analysis

Ghayyur, Shahbaz Ahmed Khan; Ahmed, Salman; Naseem, Adnan; Razzaq, Abdul

doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2017.081239

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…"An Analysis of a Web-based Product Complaint Management System" by M. A. Ahmed and A. N. Ahmed (2017).…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Product Complaint System

2023

IRJMETS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The "Product Complaint System" is a web-based application developed using ASP.NET, which provides a platform for register and track their complaints about a product. The goal of this project is to improve the complaint management process for companies and to provide a convenient and easy-to-use system. The system includes features such as complaint registration, complaint assign, complaint view and action, and reporting. They can then register their complaints by providing details such as product name, model number, and description of the issue. The reporting feature generates reports on the number of complaints received, status of complaints, resolution provided and take appropriate measures to improve their products and services. The system will have a user-friendly interface that allows users to easily submit complaints. It will also allow users to track the progress of their complaints and receive notifications when their complaint is resolved. The system is secured with authentication and authorization mechanisms to ensure that only authorized users have access to sensitive information.

show abstract

“…"An Analysis of a Web-based Product Complaint Management System" by M. A. Ahmed and A. N. Ahmed (2017).…”

Section: Literature Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Product Complaint System

2023

IRJMETS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Active learning and improvement [Vishnubhotla et al 2018]. to solve it by individual force; however, as a team each member participation is necessary [Ahmed et al 2017, Ahmed et al 2018]. -MOT.03.…”

Section: A Appendix -Conceptual and Operational Definition Of Tact's ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recognition: The credit of work should be given to the employee. By given the due recognition of work motivate them to work better for the future work [Ahmed et al 2017, Ahmed et al 2018]. -MOT.04.…”

Section: A Appendix -Conceptual and Operational Definition Of Tact's ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Clear Identification with Task: Understanding project requires the clarity of doing work. By clearing understanding, productivity of the system can be increased [Ahmed et al 2017, Ahmed et al 2018, de O. Melo et al 2012]. -MOT.05.…”

Section: A Appendix -Conceptual and Operational Definition Of Tact's ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Information Systems (IS) area community shows growing interest in investigating human factors and their effects on agile software development teams [Chagas et al 2015, Ahmed et al 2017, Ahmed et al 2018, Kakar 2020, Dutra et al 2021] and the organizational climate [Soomro et al 2016, Serrador et al 2018, Vishnubhotla et al 2020, Dutra et al 2021. Curtis et al [Curtis et al 2009] suggested in the People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM) that companies could use organizational climate surveys to identify each person's opinion on their working conditions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Using an Instrument to Assess Trust, Knowledge, Learning, and Motivation of Agile Teams

Dutra,

Cerdeiral,

Lima

et al. 2023

iSys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Trust, Knowledge, Learning, and Motivation influence the organizational environment of agile teams. Organizational climate surveys can provide concrete evidence of how the process, project activities, people, and culture work in practice. Using assessment climate instruments that do not consider agile values, principles, practices, and roles in a proper context may create difficulties in analyzing possible causes of problems and the execution of corrective actions within organizational climate management. Objective: We present a preliminary evaluation of TACT, which is an instrument to assess the organizational climate of agile teams, comprising four dimensions, Trust, Knowledge, Learning, and Motivation. Method: We planned and executed a case study considering eight development teams from three organizations. We evaluated TACT using open-ended questions, quantitative methods, and TAM dimensions of Intention to Use, Perceived Usefulness, and Output Quality. Results: TACT captured that the product owner's lack of knowledge and experience probably influenced the adverse climate in team trust and that unrealistic deadlines may have generated a lack of team motivation due to an absence of autonomy to plan the iteration. The team leaders reported intention of future use. Contributions and Impact in the IS area: TACT was grounded in scientific literature and industry observations. TACT items regarding Trust, Knowledge, Learning, and Motivation are grounded in the "agile philosophy'' and consider the most common agile practices. At the same time, it allows reflections on the behaviors of the prominent involved roles in agile projects. Based on the evidence gathered, we inferred that TACT captured the organizational climate of the teams correctly and can be used to identify issues better and improve actions aligned with the agile values, principles, and practices while developing Information Systems.

show abstract