2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational processes in the coach-athlete relationship: A multi-cultural self-determination approach

Abstract: Objective: Grounded in self-determination theory, the present study examined the cultural invariance of a model that hypothesized sport performers’ well-being will be predicted by both their perceptions of motivation and the quality of the relationship held with their coach. Method: Participants (N = 756), originating from five countries (British, Chinese, Greek, Spanish, and Swedish), completed a questionnaire that measured perceived coach-athlete relationship quality, basic psychological need satisfaction, s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
80
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
12
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that although some authors suggest that amotivation stands for “the lack of motivation to act on a certain behavior” and should therefore not be considered as controlled motivation, we use this term because of several scientific advances. Jowett and Adie have shown that amotivation is located on the same continuum as the other behavior regulations, next to external regulation without discontinuity. These authors also explain that the mere occurrence of the behavior indicates that at least some motivation is present, even if the individual feels confused or helpless with respect to behavior participation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is worth noting that although some authors suggest that amotivation stands for “the lack of motivation to act on a certain behavior” and should therefore not be considered as controlled motivation, we use this term because of several scientific advances. Jowett and Adie have shown that amotivation is located on the same continuum as the other behavior regulations, next to external regulation without discontinuity. These authors also explain that the mere occurrence of the behavior indicates that at least some motivation is present, even if the individual feels confused or helpless with respect to behavior participation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Specifically, these 18-items were used to measure amotivation, external regulation, introjected regulation, identified regulation, integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation based on the SDT motivational continuum. Response options ranged from 0 ("totally disagree") to 4 ("totally agree"), and composite scores for autonomous motivation (identified and integrated regulation, and intrinsic motivation) and controlled motivation (introjected and external regulation, and amotivation) were calculated based on previous assumptions [9,35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered one of the leading motivational theories today [57]. SDT has been used to tackle motivational studies across many disciplines, including: healthcare [58], writing [59], human resources [60,61], education [62][63][64], organizations [65][66][67], and sport [68], among others.…”
Section: Self-determination Theory (Sdt)mentioning
confidence: 99%