2000
DOI: 10.3109/16066350009004415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Motivational Predictors of Readiness to Change Chronic Substance Abuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, among alcohol abusers undergoing inpatient treatment, Cox et al (2000) found that adaptive motivational structure was a negative predictor of problem denial and a positive predictor of determination to change. That is, adaptively motivated participants both recognized the problem and expressed their motivation to change it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, among alcohol abusers undergoing inpatient treatment, Cox et al (2000) found that adaptive motivational structure was a negative predictor of problem denial and a positive predictor of determination to change. That is, adaptively motivated participants both recognized the problem and expressed their motivation to change it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Empirical investigations of motivational structure through asking people to identify their goals and rate them in terms of their value, attainability, and imminence have revealed adaptive and maladaptive motivational profiles (Cox, Blount, Bair, & Hosier, 2000;. The adaptive motivation factor is characterized by high perceived likelihood of goal attainment, expected happiness when goals are attained, and commitment to goal striving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maladaptive motivation factor is characterized by holding the goals low in importance, expecting no great amount of happiness at goal achievement, and having low commitment to goals. The adaptive factor has been identified as inversely predictive of quantities drunk in problem-drinking members of student populations and positively predictive of readiness to change in people in substance misuse treatment (Cox et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the theoretical literature on RTC, change is viewed as a process that occurs over time (Velicer et al, 1998). RTC is viewed as something dynamic, that is affected by individual drinking consequences, and that then infl uences the likelihood of one modifying one's drinking behavior (Cox et al, 2000). RTC is also conceptualized as something that can be modifi ed over the course of a therapy session, as a therapist helps to move someone from precontemplation to contemplation, for example (Amrhein et al, 2003).…”
Section: Readiness To Change: College Student Alcohol Usementioning
confidence: 99%