Motivational Interviewing Training: A Pilot Study of the Effects on Practitioner and Patient Behaviour

Britt, Eileen; Blampied, Neville M.

doi:10.1017/s1352465809990531

Cited by 23 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 7 publications

(9 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…More than two replications would have been desirable and would have added to the confidence that can be placed on the results and their generalisability. However, given that this study was a replication, and test of generalization, of the earlier Britt and Blampied (2010) study with nurse educators, this study lends support to the results of the earlier study and vice versa.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

“…The current pilot study replicated Britt and Blampied (2010) and evaluated the effect of MI training comprising a two day workshop plus ongoing feedback and coaching on both practitioner and patient in session behaviour in clinical practice with individuals experiencing difficulty with diabetes self-management. As in Britt and Blampied (2010), the study includes an analysis of the entire consultation and four sessions per practitioner-patient unit using therapist and client behaviour counts from the MISC.…”

mentioning

confidence: 89%

“…The MI-training was the same as the training that was provided to the nurse educators in the earlier study (Britt & Blampied, 2010) but one year later. The training was conducted over two days (a total of 12 hours) by the same two trainers, both of whom were experienced in training MI, one of whom (the first author) is a member of the Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers.…”

Section: Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As in Britt and Blampied (2010), the study includes an analysis of the entire consultation and four sessions per practitioner-patient unit using therapist and client behaviour counts from the MISC. The MISC behaviour counts were used as they are the only measure of both practitioner and client in-session behaviour.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The practitioners in the current study were dietitians, however, rather than nurse educators as in the previous study. The study, therefore, provides an evaluation of the transfer of MI skills to dietetic practice in a clinical setting, and the effect of this on client behaviour, and is both a test of replication and generalisation of the results of Britt and Blampied (2010). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Training Dietitians in Motivational Interviewing: A Pilot Study of the Effects on Dietitian and Patient Behaviour

Britt¹,

Blampied²

2015

MITRIP

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate the transfer of Motivational Interviewing (MI) skills to dietietic practice in a clinical setting, and the effect of this on patient behaviour.This involved a replication of Britt and Balmpied (2010), except with dietitians providing the MI rather than nurses educators as in the earlier study. The current study, therefore, is a both a test of replication and generalisation. Method: Two dietitians were trained in MI and effects of this training were evaluated on both practitioner and patient behaviour when MI was delivered in a clinical settting with patients experiencing diabetes self-management difficulties. Comparisons were made between the dietitians' and participants' behaviour during baseline (standard Patient Education, n=6 participants) and after the dieitians were trained in MI (n=5 participants). Data were collated from transcripts of all sessions independently coded using the therapist and client behaviour counts from the Motivational Interviewing Skills Code to derive therapist and client behaviour counts. Results: MI training was effective relative to baseline performance. Conclusions: When trained in MI, the practitioners behaved in ways consistent with MI, and this appears to have evoked in-session behaviour from the participants consistent with emergent MI theory.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 74%

mentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations