2014
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n5p2817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric growth characteristics and body composition of bullfrog tadpoles in captivity

Abstract: Feed management needs to be improved in frog farming to reduce the indirect effects of inadequate feeding and, consequently, to increase growth rates and nutrient deposition, obtaining better quality animals. The objective of this study was to establish morphometric growth curves for bullfrog tadpoles (Lithobates catesbeianus) and to determine nutrient deposition in the carcass. A total of 6,480 bullfrogs (Gosner stage 25) received an experimental diet (26.23% digestible protein and 32.68% crude protein) and a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The size, pellet form, floating time, odor, and high crude protein content of the Coppens fish feed could also be factors responsible for the lower growth performance. Mansano, De Stéfani, Pereira, Nascimento, and Macente (2014) reported that bullfrog tadpoles under captivity showed a lower growth rate when fed with commercial diets, while Rodriquez-Serna, Flores-Nava, Olvera-Nova, and Carmona-Osalde (1996) observed that growth rates of frogs raised with pelleted feed were considerably less compared to natural feeds. Sretarugsa, Luangborisut, Kruatrachue, and Upathan (1997) explained that high dietary protein above 40% is counterproductive in tadpole larva growth and development, while Mandelli et al (1985) showed that pelleted feed of 0.21 mm in diameter was most suitable for tadpole rearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size, pellet form, floating time, odor, and high crude protein content of the Coppens fish feed could also be factors responsible for the lower growth performance. Mansano, De Stéfani, Pereira, Nascimento, and Macente (2014) reported that bullfrog tadpoles under captivity showed a lower growth rate when fed with commercial diets, while Rodriquez-Serna, Flores-Nava, Olvera-Nova, and Carmona-Osalde (1996) observed that growth rates of frogs raised with pelleted feed were considerably less compared to natural feeds. Sretarugsa, Luangborisut, Kruatrachue, and Upathan (1997) explained that high dietary protein above 40% is counterproductive in tadpole larva growth and development, while Mandelli et al (1985) showed that pelleted feed of 0.21 mm in diameter was most suitable for tadpole rearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second issue is that this growth metric assumes a linear growth model originating at the origin, which is inappropriate for volumetric measures of body size such as mass. Amphibians and many invertebrates grow nearly exponentially during the first part of the larval phase (Wilbur 1984;Alford and Jackson 1993;Peacor and Pfister 2006;Mansano et al 2014;Muenst 2015;Meister et al 2017). Nonlinearity is especially obvious in amphibians, which lose substantial weight late in the larval stage, so that the entire growth trajectory can be approximated as an exponential process that damps exponentially (Wilbur and Collins 1973).…”
Section: E79mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative growth rate was the proportional daily growth increment: (ln( m 2 ) − ln( m 1 ))/3 days, where m 1 and m 2 are the mass of the target tadpole on the first and last day, respectively. This measure assumes that growth follows an exponential model, which is appropriate for anurans over intermediate durations of the early and middle larval stage (Mansano, De Stefani, Pereira, Nascimento, & Macente, ; Muenst, ; Van Buskirk, ; Wilbur & Collins, ). Linear growth rate was the daily growth increment in mg: ( m 2 − m 1 )/3 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%