2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Raman analysis of short chain branched ethylene and propylene metallocenic copolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(187 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Satti et al, the B‐UHMWPE/Vitamin C results obtained by DSC are practically the same (Table ); not observing differences in crystallinity values of samples using DSC. However, the B‐UHMWPE/Vitamin C results herein obtained by Raman were different from each other and are in agreement with those obtained by Satti et al These differences in the results obtained between both techniques have been attributed by some authors to experimental conditions, where sample evaluation using Raman occurred at room temperature, while samples in DSC analyses are first melted, then cooled, and melted again to be evaluated. The B‐UHMWPE crystallinity value obtained by DSC was slightly higher than that obtained using Raman technique.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Satti et al, the B‐UHMWPE/Vitamin C results obtained by DSC are practically the same (Table ); not observing differences in crystallinity values of samples using DSC. However, the B‐UHMWPE/Vitamin C results herein obtained by Raman were different from each other and are in agreement with those obtained by Satti et al These differences in the results obtained between both techniques have been attributed by some authors to experimental conditions, where sample evaluation using Raman occurred at room temperature, while samples in DSC analyses are first melted, then cooled, and melted again to be evaluated. The B‐UHMWPE crystallinity value obtained by DSC was slightly higher than that obtained using Raman technique.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Comparing the AFM for B‐UHMWPE film (Figure a) with that of the 2.0% wt Vitamin C compound (Figure c), it is noted that the Raman analysis method was more sensitive for identifying differences in the microstructure of B‐UHMWPE with Vitamin C added. Other authors also observed differing crystallinity values as obtained by Raman and DSC . For example, Satti et al observed different crystallinity values in polyolefins modified with certain co‐monomers as obtained by DSC and Raman techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…808 cm −1 is associated with helical chains within crystals (r[CH3] and backbone stretching ν[CC]), with 840 cm −1 assigned to shorter chains in helical conformation 43,46 . The increase in the intensity ratio I840/I808 has been considered in relation to helical chain disruption/isomeric defects 47,48 . A loss of CC coupling results in greater emission from side‐group mode r(CH3), expressed as a shift of the Raman band from 808 to 840 cm −1 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 43 , 46 The increase in the intensity ratio I840/I808 has been considered in relation to helical chain disruption/isomeric defects. 47 , 48 A loss of C—C coupling results in greater emission from side‐group mode r(CH3), expressed as a shift of the Raman band from 808 to 840 cm −1 . 43 When comparing the intensity ratios of I840/I808, it is clear that the LT Ti‐PP mesh expresses greater helical chain defects compared to both the ST Ti‐PP mesh and the pristine PP mesh.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%