2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological characters and SRAP analysis of two hybrids between Hibiscus dasycalyx and Hibiscus ‘Moy Grande’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SRAP markers amplify open reading frames and display a co-dominant inheritance mode, which makes it easier for hybrid identification. This hybrid identification method could further be augmented with additional morphological variability as has been previously demonstrated for C. oleifera (Fan et al 2011;Peng S et al 2011;Peng F 2012;Huang et al 2014;Abbas et al 2015;Yu et al 2016;. In the present study, we used 17 SRAP primes which resulted in stable amplification and produced unambiguous highly polymorphic DNA fragments (average % polymorphic bands (PPB) across all accessions = 91.60 % (Table 2)).…”
Section: Yield and Fruit Indicators Relationship With Genetic Distancmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SRAP markers amplify open reading frames and display a co-dominant inheritance mode, which makes it easier for hybrid identification. This hybrid identification method could further be augmented with additional morphological variability as has been previously demonstrated for C. oleifera (Fan et al 2011;Peng S et al 2011;Peng F 2012;Huang et al 2014;Abbas et al 2015;Yu et al 2016;. In the present study, we used 17 SRAP primes which resulted in stable amplification and produced unambiguous highly polymorphic DNA fragments (average % polymorphic bands (PPB) across all accessions = 91.60 % (Table 2)).…”
Section: Yield and Fruit Indicators Relationship With Genetic Distancmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Single primer or primer combinations diagnosed parental and hybrid plants. According to the method of Huang et al (2014) and Yu et al (2016), hybrids were successfully determined if they share bands exclusively amplified in male parents. However, when single primers were used, hybrid identification success rate varied across primers and ranged between 37.50 and 87.50 % for Me3-Em8 and Me3-Em7, respectively, with an overall average of 60.29 % ( Supplementary Table 1).…”
Section: Oleifera Hybrid Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have found high associations between molecular and morphological markers in ornamental plants. Morphological character and sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) analyses of two hybrids between Hibiscus dasycalyx and Hibiscus 'Moy Grande' were preformed, and the hybrids showed hybrid vigor, and intermediate flower and leaf morphology compared with the parent plants and a higher genetic similarity coefficient with the female parent (H. dasycalyx) than with the male parent (H. 'Moy Grande') (Yu et al, 2016). Diversity analysis based on agromorphological traits and microsatellitebased markers were also used in global germplasm collections of roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 All MIPs (Major Intrinsic Proteins) include two highly conserved NPA (Asn-Pro-Ala) motifs that play a crucial role in selective water conduction in aquaporin water channels. 19 Recent developments in molecular biology have resulted in the development of molecular markers such as RAPD (Randomly Amplified polymorphic DNA), 20 AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism), 21 SSR(Simple Sequence Repeat), 22 ISSR (Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat), 20 SRAP (Sequence Related Amplified Polymorphism), 23 that are used in various studies like, genetic diversity, fingerprinting and elucidation of the genetic origin of various species. Due to their many advantages, including co-dominance, high polymorphism, relative abundance and reproducibility, efficiency and simplicity, SSR markers were considered relevant markers for several studies such as plant cultivar identification, genetic linkage map construction, genetic diversity analysis, and comparative genomics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%